My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006121
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PERSHING
>
4444
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0540885
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006121
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2020 4:33:57 PM
Creation date
4/10/2020 2:08:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006121
RECORD_ID
PR0540885
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0023381
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER EXXON SERVICE STATION NO 73942
STREET_NUMBER
4444
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
PERSHING
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
11022017
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
4444 N PERSHING AVE
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1.0 INTRODUCTION <br /> Bench-scale treatability testing was conducted on soil and groundwater collected at <br /> former ExxonMobil #3942 site in Stockton, California, which contained diesel range total <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH-d), gasoline range total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH-g), <br /> BTEX compounds (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes), and methyl-t-butyl <br /> ether (MTBE) Testing was conducted to evaluate and compare the abilities of ozone <br /> (03) and Peroxone (a mixture of ozone and hydrogen peroxide) to destroy petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons in soil and groundwater at the site, and to determine whether removal was <br /> due to volatilization (by sparging) or to destruction (via chemical oxidation) This was <br /> accomplished by comparing the effect of sparging with a chemically inert gas (nitrogen) <br /> to the effect of sparging with ozone The effect of each treatment on hexavalent <br /> chromium [(Cr(VI)] (which can be formed by oxidation of naturally occurring trivalent <br /> chromium) and other secondary water quality parameters were also evaluated The <br /> effects of each treatment on secondary water quality parameters, including hexavalent <br /> chromium [(Cr(VI)], were also evaluated The potential fate of Cr(VI), which was <br /> sometimes formed by ozone and Peroxone,was also assessed <br /> 1.1 Ozone and Peroxone Background <br /> Ozone (03) is a strong oxidant that can destroy a wide range of organic compounds, <br /> including TPH-g, BTEX, and MTBE Compounds may be completely mineralized to <br /> carbon dioxide (CO2) and water (H2O), although intermediates such as acetone may be <br /> seen if they react more slowly than the parent compounds Potential intermediates of <br /> MTBE oxidation include t-butyl alcohol (TBA) and acetone Iron and other metal ions in <br /> soil and groundwater can increase the effectiveness of ozone by reacting with ozone to <br /> form hydroxyl radicals (Bower, K C and C M Miller "Filter Sand-Phosphate Buffer <br /> Effect on 2,4-Dimtrotoluene Ozonation," J Environ Eng February 2002, 131-136, and <br /> references therein) Because the hydroxyl radical is an even stronger oxidant than ozone, <br /> its formation will reduce the likelihood of oxidation by-products <br /> Peroxone is a mixture of ozone and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) This combination may <br /> also generate hydroxyl radicals as well as other radicals, potentially making Peroxone an <br /> even stronger oxidant than ozone alone Furthermore, Fenton-type reactions, which <br /> provide an additional source of hydroxyl and other radicals, may occur if iron present in <br /> the sub-surface reacts with H2O2 <br /> Equations 1-4 show the reactions for conversion of benzene (C6HO, toluene (C7H8), <br /> ethylbenzene (CgH,o) and xylenes (C$141fl) to carbon dioxide (CO2) and water (H20) by <br /> ozone Chemical reactions cannot be written for TPH-g and TPH-d because TPH-g and <br /> TPH-d are complex mixtures of chemicals The stoichiometnc ozone requirements for <br /> the complete mineralization of each hydrocarbon are given in Table 1 In practice, a <br /> greater-than-stoichiometric dose of 03 will usually be required because 03 is a non- <br /> selective oxidant that will react with natural organic matter and other non-target <br /> June 1,2005 ETFC-Exxon#3942 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.