Laserfiche WebLink
1.0 INTRODUCTION <br /> Bench-scale treatability testing was conducted on soil and groundwater collected at <br /> former ExxonMobil #3942 site in Stockton, California, which contained diesel range total <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH-d), gasoline range total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH-g), <br /> BTEX compounds (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes), and methyl-t-butyl <br /> ether (MTBE) Testing was conducted to evaluate and compare the abilities of ozone <br /> (03) and Peroxone (a mixture of ozone and hydrogen peroxide) to destroy petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons in soil and groundwater at the site, and to determine whether removal was <br /> due to volatilization (by sparging) or to destruction (via chemical oxidation) This was <br /> accomplished by comparing the effect of sparging with a chemically inert gas (nitrogen) <br /> to the effect of sparging with ozone The effect of each treatment on hexavalent <br /> chromium [(Cr(VI)] (which can be formed by oxidation of naturally occurring trivalent <br /> chromium) and other secondary water quality parameters were also evaluated The <br /> effects of each treatment on secondary water quality parameters, including hexavalent <br /> chromium [(Cr(VI)], were also evaluated The potential fate of Cr(VI), which was <br /> sometimes formed by ozone and Peroxone,was also assessed <br /> 1.1 Ozone and Peroxone Background <br /> Ozone (03) is a strong oxidant that can destroy a wide range of organic compounds, <br /> including TPH-g, BTEX, and MTBE Compounds may be completely mineralized to <br /> carbon dioxide (CO2) and water (H2O), although intermediates such as acetone may be <br /> seen if they react more slowly than the parent compounds Potential intermediates of <br /> MTBE oxidation include t-butyl alcohol (TBA) and acetone Iron and other metal ions in <br /> soil and groundwater can increase the effectiveness of ozone by reacting with ozone to <br /> form hydroxyl radicals (Bower, K C and C M Miller "Filter Sand-Phosphate Buffer <br /> Effect on 2,4-Dimtrotoluene Ozonation," J Environ Eng February 2002, 131-136, and <br /> references therein) Because the hydroxyl radical is an even stronger oxidant than ozone, <br /> its formation will reduce the likelihood of oxidation by-products <br /> Peroxone is a mixture of ozone and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) This combination may <br /> also generate hydroxyl radicals as well as other radicals, potentially making Peroxone an <br /> even stronger oxidant than ozone alone Furthermore, Fenton-type reactions, which <br /> provide an additional source of hydroxyl and other radicals, may occur if iron present in <br /> the sub-surface reacts with H2O2 <br /> Equations 1-4 show the reactions for conversion of benzene (C6HO, toluene (C7H8), <br /> ethylbenzene (CgH,o) and xylenes (C$141fl) to carbon dioxide (CO2) and water (H20) by <br /> ozone Chemical reactions cannot be written for TPH-g and TPH-d because TPH-g and <br /> TPH-d are complex mixtures of chemicals The stoichiometnc ozone requirements for <br /> the complete mineralization of each hydrocarbon are given in Table 1 In practice, a <br /> greater-than-stoichiometric dose of 03 will usually be required because 03 is a non- <br /> selective oxidant that will react with natural organic matter and other non-target <br /> June 1,2005 ETFC-Exxon#3942 <br />