Laserfiche WebLink
3.5.3 Long-term Cr(VI) Reducing Capacity <br /> The long-term Cr(VI) reducing capacity tests used ozone-treated or Peroxone-treated site <br /> groundwater and untreated site soil to assess whether Cr(VI) generated during treatment <br /> could be reduced as predicted by the total and available Cr(VI) reducing capacity tests <br /> discussed in Sections 3 5 1 and 3 5 2 A long-term test using clean, untreated <br /> groundwater and untreated soil was also performed for comparison <br /> The results of the long-term reducing capacity tests are shown in Table 10 The results <br /> clearly indicate that Cr(VI)potentially generated during ozone or Peroxone treatment can <br /> attenuate once the Cr(VI) contacts untreated soil For example, within 15 days, complete <br /> removal of Cr(VI) was seen in the Ozone sparged test in which the Cr(VI) was generated <br /> solely by treatment with ozone Complete removal was seen almost immediately (within <br /> 3 days) in the Peroxone-treated test spiked with 560 µg/L Cr(VI) and using a 1 1 soil to <br /> liquid ratio Partial removal was seen in the Peroxone test that was spiked with 750 gg/L <br /> Cr(VI) and using a 1 4 soil to liquid ratio The reason for this difference is uncertain but <br /> is probably due to residual ozone in the 750 mg/L test which inhibited Cr(VI) attenuation <br /> by competing with Cr(VI) for reducible species in the untreated soil <br /> It should be noted that the initial concentration of Cr(VI) in most of these tests was <br /> • greater than or equal to the highest concentration observed after treatment with ozone or <br /> Peroxone (570 mg/L) and that all of this Cr(VI) was reduced Even in the test spiked <br /> with 750 µg/L Cr(VI), 520 µg/L of Cr(VI)was reduced <br /> 3.6 Ozone Demand <br /> The ozone demand of soil and water was measured These values are estimates that can <br /> be used as guidance to determine the size of an ozone generator that would be needed for <br /> field application of either ozone or Peroxone <br /> The concentration of ozone over time in the groundwater demand and soil demand tests is <br /> shown in Figures 1 and 2, respectively The ozone concentration decreased much more <br /> rapidly in the first 15 minutes in the presence of groundwater than in the absence of <br /> groundwater GWODo,was therefore calculated for all data points using Eqn 9 and <br /> found to range from 110 to 1$0 mg 03/L groundwater Based on the concentration of <br /> BTEX in untreated IP groundwater and the stoichiometric doses given in Table 1, the <br /> expected GWOD., was 320 mg 03/L of groundwater This value is about 2-3 times the <br /> measured demand Possibly, hydrocarbons were volatilized during set-up of GWODoz <br /> test Clearly, however, the groundwater does not exert an unexpectedly high demand <br /> Pk1MA Environmental 19 Eva]of Peroxone <br /> June 1,2005 ETIC-Exxon#3942 <br />