My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006951
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
5606
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541401
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006951
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2020 2:53:08 PM
Creation date
4/13/2020 4:08:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006951
RECORD_ID
PR0541401
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0006046
FACILITY_NAME
UNION OIL STATION #5098
STREET_NUMBER
5606
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
5606 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
372
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SAN JOAQUIN DELTA COLLEGE <br /> • performed for only part of a day, the time during which the vapor is being released is used to determine the rate of <br /> contaminant generation <br /> Effect of Distribution and Make-up Air One of the most important factors in the design of dilution ventilation, and the one <br /> most frequently overlooked, is the need to supply sufficient and properly directed make-up air to replace the air exhausted- <br /> Ideally, <br /> xhaustedIdeally, the make-up air will be positively introduced and distributed in such a manner that the source of contaminant is <br /> situated between the worker and the exhaust outlet,the exhaust is located as close as possible to the source of contamination, <br /> all the air will pass through the zone of contamination,and the contaminant will be diluted to the design levels as soon as it is <br /> generated Under such conditions, the K factor in the formula could be 1, since no factor of safety would be required <br /> However,ideal distribution conditions can never be assumed and actual conditions will vary considerably <br /> Average conditions may be assumed to be those where the toxicity of the contaminant is moderate,the exhaust fan or fans are <br /> placed reasonably close to the operation releasing vapors,make-up is by infiltration through doors,windows,and walls so that <br /> a reasonable amount of dilution occurs as the contaminant is generated, and the worker is not too near or in the zone of <br /> concentrated contaminant release Under such circumstances, the average K factor may be taken as 4 so that the average <br /> concentration in the workroom is 114 of the TLV and the concentration in any part of the workroom will probably not be <br /> higher that the TLV <br /> However, average distribution conditions are probably as elusive as ideal conditions and the need arises for a actual <br /> conditions,whether poor,average,good, or excellent Poor distribution, such as may be caused by short circuiting the make- <br /> up air, inadequacy of infiltration as a sources of make-up au, location of the worker directly downstream form or in the <br /> evolving vapors,will require a higher factory of safety than 4 A lower factor may be used with good distribution, which will <br /> usually consist of a positive mechanical make-up air supply system with properly placed supply and exhaust fans Excellent <br /> distribution will be provided by properly located exhaust fans with a mechanical supply system directing tempered air in the <br /> optimum manner by means of diffusers, ductwork, or a perforated plenum This will make possible a further reduction in <br /> safety factor <br /> Effect of Toxicity The TLV or relative toxicity of the substance being controlled enters into the design directly since it is part <br /> of the calculation formula Where the TLV(in ppm)of a substance has been promulgated by a recognized authority such as <br /> the ACGIH or the American Standards Association,it is recommended that dilution ventilation rates be calculated using this <br /> TLV value in equation (1 2) and applying the safety factors shown in K Factors Table For other substances, the general <br /> equations in the Dilution CFM Formula Equations, as well as the K Factor Table should be used <br /> Dilution CFM Formula Equations <br /> Slightly toxic cfm=(I x 106 (d)(pints evaporated per min) K <br /> substances mol wt <br /> Moderately toxic cfm=(2 x 106)(d)( rots evaporated ver mm)K <br /> substances mol wt <br /> Highly toxic cfm=(8 x 106)(d)(pints evaporated per min)(K) <br /> substances moi wt <br /> d=specific gravity of liquid <br /> mol wt=molecular weight of liquid <br /> The general dilution ventilation equations have been derived form equation (1 2) using arbitrary values of 400 ppm as the <br /> TLV for slightly toxic substances,and 200 ppm for moderately toxic substances,and 50 ppm for highly toxic substances <br /> If more knowledge were available,a rational method for designing dilution ventilation for such mixtures could be formulated. <br /> . In the absence of such information,dilution ventilation rates should be calculated for each component of the mixture and the <br /> cfm values obtained added together to p ve a total efin rate A method which is occasionally used to af[brd greater safety is to <br /> assume that the entire volume of mixture being evaporated consists of the component with the highest cfin rate per pmt and to <br /> calculated cfiri accordingly <br /> Page #10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.