SU0002453 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

as non-spec oil and require the it be transported to an appropriate facility to dispose of non-SB86 oil. If such commingling occurs, a condition should be imposed to prohibit the further processing of such commingled oil. Condition No. 14 would prohibit the acceptance of off-spec materials at the site. Falcon Energy' s response is evasive. It neither accepts nor rejects this condition. The Committee should insist on either an acceptance or a rejection. Additionally, the Committee should require Falcon Energy to specify and identify that the receiver of the hazardous material which cannot be accepted at the site, be required to provide San Joaquin County with written agreement by such a receiver to accept such off-spec materials. Condition No. 17 would limit utilization of the briquetting facility to biomass materials without prior authorization from appropriate regulatory agencies. Falcon Energy' s response is evasive in that it only states Falcon Energy' s "plans" at this time. Condition No. 17 should be strengthened to restrict utilization of the briquetting facility to biomass materials only. This would insure the modification of the condition by San Joaquin Planning authorities would be necessary prior to any change in the operation and use of non-biomass materials. Condition No. 22 would require that the retention pond be lined to prevent leaking of contaminants into the ground water. Condition No. 21 requires limited testing of the pond water. The retention pond water should be analyzed by the Regional Water Quality Control Board or other appropriate agency before it is allowed to enter Weber Slough or exit the site. It will contain runoff from the material handling area. Condition No. 32 would require the applicant to provide funds for equipment and personnel for hazardous waste clean-up group. The applicant' s answer is evasive, although it appears to refuse to provide anything other than training. Such a condition is appropriate pursuant to Section 25199 . 7 ( 2) (A) wherein the LAC Committee is charged with providing conditions which would " .)romote the fiscal welfare of the city or county through special benefits and compensation. " As the Draft Environmental Impact does not identify a specific amount, it is difficult for the Committee to perform its duties and specify such an amount. Farm Bureau recommends that the Committee insist on this condition and provide a mechanism for determining an appropriate amount. Condition No. 33 requires that sludge be removed from the site and transported to an authorized disposal site. Falcon Energy' s answer is evasive and does not appear to either agree or to reject the proposal, but only to comply with appropriate regulations. The Committee should insist on the following: ( 1) That Falcon Energy identify the site to which the materials will be transported; ( 2) That it identify how much this site is willing to accept; ( 3 ) That it provide evidence, in writing, that 5