Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. 6 <br /> PC: 6-18-92 <br /> ZR-92-10 <br /> Page 3 <br /> STAFF ANALYSIS <br /> POLICY CONSIDERATIONS: <br /> Staff's recommendation to the Planning Commission to deny the proposal is based upon (1) its potential <br /> for disrupting a viable, commercial, agricultural area of the County and (2) the inappropriateness f <br /> creating a new Limited Agriculture area. The following two sections of the staff report discuss the e <br /> issues in detail and address the proposal's inconsistencies with the General Plan and the intent of t e <br /> Planning Title's Agricultural Division. <br /> AGRICULTURAL DISRUPTION: <br /> The project site is designated Agriculture on the General Plan and is zoned AG-40 (General Agriculture; <br /> 40-acre minimum parcel size). The proposed zone designation of AL-5 is also one of the implementing <br /> zones for the Agriculture General Plan designation, according to the Zoning/General Plan Consistency <br /> Matrix in the Land Use/Circulation Element of the General Plan. However, the approval of this request <br /> would be inconsistent with the following General Plan Agriculture Objectives and Principles regarding the <br /> preservation of agricultural resources and minimizing disruptions of agricultural areas: <br /> Obiective No. 2: <br /> To preserve In agriculture those soils capable of producing a wide variety of valuable cro S. <br /> The site's two soil types, Cogna clay loam (CD) and Vignolo silty clay loam (AV), are designated <br /> as Prime Farmland and Farmland of Statewide Significance, respectively, by the United States <br /> Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Services's Soil Survey of San Joaquin County <br /> (October 1988). The approval of the project would permanently remove a large portion of e <br /> project site from agricultural production. <br /> Obiective No. 3: <br /> To minimize disruption to viable agricultural areas. <br /> The subdivision of the project site into five-acre parcels,with the resultant construction of a pu lic <br /> road, single-family residences, and accessory structures, would not only disrupt agricult ral <br /> activities on the site, as noted above, but would also disrupt similar activities on other agricultral <br /> parcels in the area. This disruption would result from conflicts between the existing agricult iral <br /> uses and the increased number of residences in the area. <br /> Principle No. 1: <br /> The resources upon which agriculture Is based will be protected, and the utilization of these <br /> resources for agricultural purposes will be encouraged. <br /> The conversion of approximately 20 acres within a larger area containing Prime Farmlands d <br /> Farmlands of Statewide Significance results in the consumption rather than the preservatio of <br />