Laserfiche WebLink
Updated Site Conceptual Model and First Quarter 2003 Monitoring and Rernediation Report <br /> Cleanu and Abatement Order No 5-00-707 EAI Project No 1232 <br /> 3.0 GROUND WATER MONITORING <br /> On February 7, 2003, the remediation system was deactivated to allow ground water to stabilize <br /> before initiating gauging and sampling activities All ground water monitoring and sampling <br /> activities were completed by Gettler-Ryan, Inc between February 18 and 21, 2003 The <br /> system was reactivated on February 22, 2003 after completion of all monitoring and sampling <br /> efforts for this reporting period Note well MW-2 was covered with a pallet containing <br /> construction materials GRI personnel were unable to access this well during gauging or <br /> ground water sampling activities <br /> 3.1 Ground Water Sampling <br /> On February 18, 2003, prior to purging or sampling activities, depth measurements to fluid <br />' levels were obtained by GRI from all monitoring wells associated with the Wards and Unocal <br /> (MW-1 through MW-27) sites Depth measurements were obtained using an interface probe <br /> accurate to 0 01 foot No free-product was detected in any of the wells The water level <br /> measurement for each well was converted to mean sea Ievel (MSL) datum by subtracting the <br /> measured water level for each well from its respective "top of well casing elevation" datum <br /> (Table 3) <br /> Between February 18 and 21, 2003, ground water samples were collected from the wells by <br /> GRI for analytical testing Standard operating procedures used by GRI for ground water <br /> monitoring are contained in Appendix A Appendix B contains the GRI ground water <br /> monitoring field logs, and Appendix C the chain of custody records <br /> 3.2 Effluent Handling <br /> I <br /> As requested by Unocal, the purge water and decontamination water generated during sampling <br />' activities was transported by GRI to Tosco — San Francisco Area Refinery, located in Rodeo, <br /> California (Appendix A) <br /> 3.3 Analytical Testing <br /> The samples were delivered for analytical testing to Sequoia Analytical in San Carlos, <br /> California a state certified hazardous waste testing laboratory (Certificate No 2360) Sequoia <br /> Analytical is certified for all tests completed as part of this investigation <br /> The samples were analyzed for VOCs, including fuel oxygenates, e g , MTBE, TBA, DIPE, <br /> E T BE, TAME, and EDB by EPA Method 8260B, and TPH-G by modified EPA Method 8015 <br /> Pursuant to discussions with the RWQCB, the samples were not tested for ethanol or methanol <br /> Tables I and 4 present the historic and current (February 2003) analytical test data for the sites, <br /> respectively Appendix C contains the laboratory reports <br /> Pursuant to a request from the RWQCB, the laboratory reports list several "tentatively <br /> identified compounds" (TICS) that are not typically reported with 8260B compounds <br /> axM WORD 1212RI121 -5- ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT, INC <br /> t <br />