Laserfiche WebLink
Updated Inn,Conceptual Model and Fourth Quarter 2002 Mon,tormg and Remediation Report <br /> Cleanup and Abatement Order No 5-00-707 _ EAT Project No 1232 <br />' 3.0 GROUND WATER MONITORING <br /> On November 27, 2002, the remediation system was deactivated to allow ground water to <br />' stabilize before initiating gauging and sampling activities All ground water monitoring and <br /> sampling activities were completed by Gettler-Ryan, Inc between December 1 and 3, 2002 <br /> The system was reactivated on December 11, 2002 after completion of all monitoring and <br />' sampling efforts for this reporting period Note GRI personnel were unable to open wells MW- <br /> 19S, MW-19D, MW-25S, and MW-25D Therefore, these wells were neither gauged nor <br /> sampled during the current sampling event <br /> 3.1 Ground Water Sampling <br /> On December 1, 2002, prior to purging or sampling activities, depth measurements to fluid <br /> levels were obtained by GRI from all monitoring wells associated with the Wards and Unocal <br /> (MW-1 through MW-27) sites Depth measurements were obtained using an interface probe <br /> accurate to 0 01 foot No free-product was detected in any of the wells The water level <br /> measurement for each well was converted to mean sea level (MSL) datum by subtracting the <br /> measured water level for each well from its respective "top of well casing elevation" datum (see <br /> Table 3) <br /> Between December 1 and 3, 2002, ground water samples were collected from the wells by GRI <br /> for analytical testing Standard operating procedures used by GRI for ground water monitoring <br /> are contained in Appendix A Appendix B contains the GRI ground water monitoring field <br /> logs, and Appendix C the chain of custody records <br /> 3.2 Effluent Handling <br /> As requested by Unocal, the purge water and decontammation water generated during sampling <br /> activities was transported by GRI to Tosco — San Francisco Area Refinery, located in Rodeo, <br /> California (see Appendix A) <br /> 3.3 Analytical Testing <br /> The samples were delivered for analytical testing to Sequoia Analytical in San Carlos, <br /> California a state certified hazardous waste testing laboratory (Certificate No 2360) Sequoia <br /> Analytical is certified for all tests completed as part of this investigation <br /> The samples were analyzed for VOCs, including fuel oxygenates, e g , MTBE, TBA, DIPE, <br /> ETRE, TAME, and EDB by EPA Method 826013, and TPH-G by modified EPA Method 8015 <br />' Pursuant to discussions with the RWQCB, the samples were not tested for ethanol or methanol <br /> Tables 1 and 4 present the historic and current (December 2002) analytical test data for the <br /> sites, respectively Appendix C contains the laboratory reports <br /> Pursuant to a request from the RWQCB, the laboratory reports list several "tentatively <br /> • identified compounds" (TICS) that are not typically reported with 8260B compounds (see <br /> BHM WORD 1232Ra2D1 -5- EIMRONMENTAL AUDIT,INC p <br />