Laserfiche WebLink
b Prepare air flow versus time graphs for each infection well to determine if <br /> past flow rates differ significantly from current conditions A quarterly O&M <br /> plan needs to be established so that this information can be collected on a <br /> regular basis ENSR currently has data from two events and has tabulated both <br /> events With data from future events, ENSR can determine if flow rates differ <br /> over time However, currently, there is insufficient data to make such a <br /> determination <br /> c Construct groundwater concentration versus time graphs for the <br /> contaminants of concern at each monitoring point Have individual <br /> monitoring points reached a consistent asymptote on the concentration <br /> versus time graph without significant rebound? Concentrations of total <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) and benzene have been graphed <br /> over time for monitoring wells MW-2, MW-3, MW-4, MW-6, MW-8D, MW-919R, <br /> MW-11, MW-12, and MW-25D Wells MW-2, MW-4, MW-6, MW-8D, MW-919R, <br /> MW-12, and MW-25D have shown stable decreasing trends but concentrations <br /> are still elevated enough in MW-3 TPHg > 20,000 uglL, benzene > 4,000 ug/L <br /> and MW-11 TPHg > 11,000 ug/L, benzene > 4,000 ug/L) to justify the continued <br /> operation of the ISAS system at the site <br /> d Construct groundwater contaminant concentration iso-concentration maps <br /> of the site Do the contaminant concentrations indicate that the treatment <br /> is effective throughout the target zone? Quarterly groundwater monitoring <br /> data has been used to create isoconcentration maps These figures indicate that <br /> the TPHg and benzene plumes beneath the site have decreased significantly <br /> since remediation at the site began Quarterly isoconcentration maps show that <br /> the TPHg and benzene plumes in Unit B have increased in the vicinity of MW-11 <br /> 6 Adequacy of Operations and Maintenance <br /> a Has the entire system been operating with enough consistency to achieve <br /> its objective in a reasonable time? (A good operational target should be <br /> 90% uptime or better) The ISAS has operated 1,480 hours since ENSR <br /> restarted the system on June 14, 2004, approximately 50 percent of available <br /> uptime The system has been operated on a week on 1 week off basis as <br /> approved by the RWQCB since June 14, 2004 which explains the 50% uptime <br /> b Are the monitoring points constructed to yield reliable results (e g , short <br /> screens, checked for plugging/response)? The ISAS wells are designed with <br /> screens that range in length from approximately 5 0 feet to 7 5 feet in length <br /> The screen lengths should be adequate for the purpose of air spargmg at this <br /> site <br /> c Verify that the air flows are balanced if multiple sparging wells are being <br /> used Pressure measurements collected from the the ISAS well-heads have <br /> shown to be fairly evenly distributed throughout the well field (ranging from 17 5 <br /> psi to --26 pounds per square inch (psi)) Air flows were not balanced due to the <br /> varying distances of the ISAS wells from the compressor and varying screen <br /> depths <br />