Laserfiche WebLink
L <br /> • MW-25S, MW-28, MW-29, and MW-30 indicate that the TPHg and benzene <br /> plumes may have reached cleanup objectives <br /> b If the cleanup objectives have not yet been met, can the system be turned <br /> off and natural attenuation be allowed to achieve the cleanup objective <br /> while remaining protective of human health and the environment? There <br /> are still elevated concentrations of dissolved petroleum hydrocarbons in <br /> groundwater that dictate that the system should continue to operate <br /> c Can additional wells be placed in the plume? Or, can the injection rates <br /> from existing wells be redistributed in a way that would economically <br /> speed up remediation? ENSR has proposed that additional ISAS wells be <br /> installed in the vicinity of MW-3 and MW-11 which would more directly treat the <br /> existing plumes of TPHg and benzene in groundwater beneath the site <br /> d Evaluate the aboveground system for ability to achieve cost savings by <br /> reducing the number of wells Can changes be made in the above-ground <br /> system to achieve efficient operation at a reduced flow rate? In some <br /> cases, the capacity gained by removing non-productive wells may allow <br /> higher air flow rates through the more contaminated parts of the site <br /> However, blowers may need to be adjusted or possibly replaced by <br /> different sized units to accommodate changes in airflow/vacuum <br /> requirements It is unlikely that the compressor will need to be replaced <br /> because it is sufficiently sized to acheive the system objectives As stated <br /> previously in this document, ENSR will perform future site visits to better evaluate <br /> individual ISAS well performance Moreover, ENSR will determine if any sparge <br /> wells should be removed from the current sparging program because they are <br /> not in an area of concentrated contaminants <br /> e If the ISAS system is accompanied by an SVE system, is it still necessary <br /> to capture the vapors with SVE? In some cases, there is no risk in allowing <br /> the sparged air to pass upward into the unsaturated zone without capture <br /> For aerobically degradable contaminant vapors, the sparged air may <br /> function in a manner similar to bioventing such that biological processes in <br /> the unsaturated zone consume much of the contaminant vapor Yes, it is <br /> still necessary to capture the vapors with SVE The SVE system has been <br /> effective in extracting volatilized petroieum hydrocarbons in unit B As stated <br /> previously in this document, the site exhibited contaminant rebound and plume <br /> migration while the SVE system was smut down ENSR will continue to operate <br /> the SVE system until it no longer a feasible remediation option <br /> s u__ �.- f 66- w�t.�..iii barn t_naidarArih Yes when operated <br /> I rias pulsing v. %19, 7S <br /> independently the ISAS system is operated in pulse operations mode one week <br /> on 1 one week off Due to the manifolded piping design and layout, the ISAS <br /> wells can not be sequentially operated using a programmable timer <br /> g Other technologies ENSR is considering upgrades to the ISAS system that <br /> includes dedicated piping runs for each ISAS well <br /> • 9 Supplemental Notes and Data <br /> ENSRs Process Flow Diagram <br />