My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008002
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
5606
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541401
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2020 2:57:42 PM
Creation date
4/14/2020 1:19:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008002
RECORD_ID
PR0541401
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0006046
FACILITY_NAME
UNION OIL STATION #5098
STREET_NUMBER
5606
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
5606 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
427
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5) Performance Analysis Calculations <br /> a) Prepare vapor flow rate versus time graphs for each extraction well Are the vapor extraction <br /> rates the same as those in the design specifications? Have the vapor extraction rates changed <br /> since the initial period of operation? <br /> b) Construct vacuum isopleth maps of the site Is the vacuum distribution consistent with that <br /> predicted during design?Does the vacuum distribution (in three dimensions) indicate capture of <br /> vapors and prevention of migration to receptors9 <br /> c) Are monitoring points distributed adequately to determine vacuum distribution, flow paths, or <br /> containment? Are monitoring points distributed adequately to determine if adequate air flow or <br /> vapor capture is achieved in three dimensions9 (In most cases, vacuum monitoring points set at <br /> multiple depths are needed to verify vertical flow components) <br /> d) Construct concentration versus time graphs for all contaminants of concern in each extraction <br /> well Construct isopleth maps of the current soil gas concentrations for each contaminant of <br /> concern Have contaminant concentrations been declining in most of the target zone? <br /> e) Have individual wells or the system as a whole reached a consistent asymptote on the <br /> concentration versus time graph without significant rebound? ("Significant rebound" might be <br /> defined as an increase of 25-50% above the asymptote concentration value) <br /> Q Are the well depths and screened intervals adequate to optimally direct air through the target <br /> zone? Is there evidence of preferential flow paths or hydrogeologic boundaries that were not <br /> considered in the system design? (Prepare hvdrogeologic cross sections using available well <br /> boring logs, including the extraction wells, of cross sections of the area of concern are not <br /> available) <br /> 06ro7r9g <br /> Page 4 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.