My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008002
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
5606
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541401
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2020 2:57:42 PM
Creation date
4/14/2020 1:19:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008002
RECORD_ID
PR0541401
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0006046
FACILITY_NAME
UNION OIL STATION #5098
STREET_NUMBER
5606
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
5606 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
427
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a) Is there evidence of too much air flow through the soil such that travel times are too small, or <br /> that diffusion limitations hamper the effectiveness of the high extraction rates? (If extracting air <br /> at higher rates does not increase the mass removal rate, the system may be moving more air than <br /> necessary) <br /> b) Is there evidence of short-circuiting along the well casing, through nearby utility corridors, or <br /> through soil fractures or other subsurface features? Consider well replacement or relocation <br /> e) Have the VOC concentrations in the extracted gas (in combined influent or from most wells) <br /> approached an asymptotic concentration value9 This may be caused by diffusion limitations, <br /> continuing source, or poor well placement Consider whether reduced flows, system pulsing, <br /> additional wells thermally enhanced SVE, or bioventing might remove additional contaminant <br /> mass <br /> d) Are there portions of the target zone in which contaminant concentrations have failed to <br /> decline in response to SVE? This may be due to inadequate air flow in that portion of the target <br /> zone, diffusion limitations, high soil moisture content perhaps to due to surface irrigation, or a <br /> continued source of contaminants in that area Consider increasing air extraction rates from <br /> certain wells or the entire system, adding wells in areas of inadequate extraction, limiting <br /> irrigation, or excavating hot spot soils <br /> e) Are extremely high concentrations of VOCs, at or near explosive levels, present in the <br /> extracted gas? This may be due to a continuing source, floating product, high levels of residual <br /> contaminants, or accumulation of methane Consider adding dilution air, reducing the flow rate <br /> from "hot spot"wells, or replacing the SVE off-gas treatment system with a flare or internal <br /> combustion engine (ICE) treatment system <br /> fJ Do the VOC concentrations in the extracted gas vary significantly over time? This maybe <br /> due to ground water fluctuations, soil moisture variations due to precipitation, or a periodic <br /> continuing source Consider controlling groundwater levels, installing a surface cover, or other <br /> source removal alternatives <br /> g) Have the total extraction rates failed to reach the expected design rates or the extraction rates <br /> needed for efficient operation? This may be due to poor well installation, improper well design, <br /> 06/07/99 <br /> Page 6 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.