My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 1
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MONTE DIABLO
>
1766
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0535112
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2020 3:26:54 PM
Creation date
4/15/2020 2:08:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0535112
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0020296
FACILITY_NAME
CHAPIN BROTHERS INC
STREET_NUMBER
1766
STREET_NAME
MONTE DIABLO
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
13505050
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1766 MONTE DIABLO AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
268
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
November 29, 1994 <br /> California State Water Resources Control Board <br /> Division of Clean Water Program <br /> Region 5 Underground Storage Cleanup Fund Program <br /> Post Office Box 944212 <br /> Sacramento, ,California 94244-2120 <br /> Attention: Mr. . George Lockwood <br /> Subject: Chapin Bros. Inc. 0 F >_ 1994 <br /> 1766 Monte Diablo Ave. <br /> Stockton, California 95203 <br /> Site#: 000557 EN PERMIT/SERVICES ENIAIL LTH <br /> Dear Mr. George Lockwood: <br /> As previously discussed we have obtained three bids from the <br /> following engineering firms, concering recommendations to perform <br /> additional vapor extraction and air sparging tests which will <br /> provide adequate information to prepare final remediation (FRP) <br /> for the site in question. <br /> 1 LUSH GEOSCIENCE $31,499 <br /> 2 WALLACE-KUHL 30,605 <br /> 3 GEOLOGICAL AUDIT SERVICES, INC. 15,410 <br /> 4 ANDERSON CONSULTING (NO RESPONSE) <br /> We have met Harlan Knoll (PHS/EHD) and engineers on site and it <br /> would appear that the scope of work as presented is satisfactory <br /> to perform the necessary tasks through the remediation phase <br /> of the project. <br /> Therefore, I request approval of re-imbursement for the additional <br /> work which is outlined in the three proposals submitted. Obviously <br /> if they don't meet the guidelines set for re-imbursement this <br /> project is dead in the water. <br /> I appreciate your candid discussion and wish to thank you for <br /> reviewing our request. I hope to hear from you soon and please <br /> don't hesitate to call if you should have any questions. <br /> S}ncerely, <br /> Russell F. Chapin Sr. President <br /> Chapin Bros. Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.