Laserfiche WebLink
Destruction Report 5 <br /> C& <br /> tional Sales Inc. <br /> May Cardno <br /> May 26,6,201 2015 <br /> Shaping the Future <br /> made available for the SJCEHD to inspect and to verify that the well had been properly destroyed. The <br /> grout was finished to grade and resurfaced to match the surrounding surface completion. <br /> Wells Abandoned by "Popsicling" Technique <br /> MW4, MW6, and MW7 were destroyed by the "popsicling" technique because overdrilling was not <br /> possible. MW4, and MW6 were sandwiched between two newly installed pipelines that were not present <br /> at the time of the well's installation and MW7 was inaccessible to a drill rig due to the construction of a <br /> building over the top of the monitoring well. Popsicling began by using an air knife to remove the soil <br /> encircling and exposing the well box casing and grout column. All the exposed well components were <br /> removed from the air knifed excavation. Then a special driller's tool was threaded into the remaining well <br /> casing to enable the removal of the remaining well casing. In the case of MW4 and MW6 the casing was <br /> removed with the conventional drill rig, but MW7 required the use of a tripod and winch due to the access <br /> limitations. Once the component parts of the well were removed, the borehole was backfilled with a neat <br /> cement grout slurry mix from the base of the annulus to the surface using a tremmie pipe. Any <br /> groundwater displaced to the surface during grout installation was pumped out of the excavation, <br /> collected, and collected into drums for proper disposal. This water was made available for the SJCEHD <br /> to inspect and to verify that the well has been properly destroyed. The grout was finished to grade and <br /> resurfaced to match the surrounding surface completion. <br /> Wells Abandoned by Pressure Grouting Technique <br /> Groundwater monitoring well MW5 was destroyed by pressure grouting according to the following <br /> procedure. <br /> Prior to destruction, a 24-inch diameter hole was cut into the concrete. The well box and locking plug <br /> were removed and an air knife was used to remove a 24-inch diameter column of soil encircling the <br /> casing to a depth of approximately 36 inches. The well casing was cut off 30 inches below grade and <br /> was removed. A specialized pressure-grouting tool was affixed to the well casing to deliver and emplace <br /> a neat cement grout slurry under pressure into the well. The slurry was pumped under pressure into the <br /> remaining casing until the slurry was injected into the sand filter pack and filled the remaining casing. <br /> Once grout extended to the top of the well casing, air pressure of 25 PSI was applied to the well casing <br /> for approximately five minutes. Additional grout was poured into the top of the well casing as necessary. <br /> MW5 was deemed successfully destroyed when a pressure of 25 PSI was maintained for five minutes <br /> with the grout dropping less than one foot. Following the pressure procedure, additional grout was made <br /> to overflow into the excavation and form a minimum 24-inch diameter "mushroom cap" like seal, with at <br /> least 12 inches of neat cement grout poured 6 inches above and 6 inches below the top of the cut-off <br /> casing. Any remaining soil voids were backfilled compacted and resurfaced to match the surrounding <br /> surface completion. <br /> Well Destruction Logs <br /> The California Department of Water Resources (DWR) requires that all well installation and destruction <br /> activities be reported. Upon completion of well destruction activities, Cardno and Gregg prepared DWR <br /> well destruction logs and submitted them to the DWR office in Sacramento. Copies of the submitted logs <br /> can be found in Appendix A <br /> Waste Disposal <br /> The investigation derived waste (IDW), including soil cuttings, groundwater, and decontamination water <br /> generated during well destruction activities were contained in DOT approved 55-gallon steel drums and <br /> temporarily stored on site in the existing remediation compound. The IDW were profiled and found not to <br /> contain contaminants above laboratory method detection limits. The analytical results for IDW can be <br /> found in Appendix B. Since the IDW was sampled, analyzed and determined to be free of <br /> www.cardno.com <br />