My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0081892 SSNL
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LOWER SACRAMENTO
>
26850
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SR0081892 SSNL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2020 3:47:08 PM
Creation date
4/17/2020 9:47:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0081892
PE
2602
FACILITY_NAME
26850 N LOWER SACRAMENTO RD
STREET_NUMBER
26850
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
LOWER SACRAMENTO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
ACAMPO
Zip
95220
APN
00503007
ENTERED_DATE
3/16/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
26850 N LOWER SACRAMENTO RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TSok
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Joe Murphy <br /> From: Joe Murphy <br /> Sent: Monday,July 01, 2019 4:57 PM <br /> To: Mikacich,Tony P; Norman Hulberg <br /> Cc: Hubbart, Garret S;Woods,Tamara K; 'Frank Schmidt' <br /> Subject: RE: Galt - Project Update for the 10 Deep Borings and Percolation Testing <br /> Thanks Tony. It interesting in that 3 of the failures just missed by 2.5 minutes and one of the failures percolated too 4 <br /> quickly but not by much. Maybe your letter will answer this but do you have any analysis on the soils borings throughout <br /> the 25 feet? In other words,could there been a sand strata at say 15 feet but the hole was dug to 25'and you only really <br /> test the bottom few feet. In this hypothetical example, if there was sand at 15 feet and the test was done at that level, <br /> might we have gotten positive results? I'm not critiquing your work as I know you were instructed to do deep tests. <br /> Dillon&Murphy doesn't do deep tests so I'm just trying to better understand the procedure. <br /> Thank you. <br /> Joe <br /> From: Mikacich,Tony P<Tony.Mikacich@terracon.com> <br /> Sent: Monday,July 01, 2019 11:14 AM <br /> To: Norman Hulberg<nhulberg@valbridge.com> <br /> Cc:Joe Murphy<jmurphy@dillonandmurphy.com>; Hubbart, Garret S<Garret.Hubbart@terracon.com>;Woods, <br /> Tamara K<Tamara.Woods@terracon.com>; 'Frank Schmidt'<fschmidt@garlic.com> <br /> Subject: RE:Galt-Project Update for the 10 Deep Borings and Percolation Testing <br /> Hello Norman, <br /> I apologize for the delay on sending the summary results. Please see the summary table below for the percolation test <br /> results. As presented in the table; borings B14, B16, B17, and B21 passed the percolation testing.The remaining borings <br /> were considered unsatisfactory for the 25 foot test(either too fast or too slow).We will have the final letter report <br /> prepared by the end of day Wednesday. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. <br /> Best Regards, <br /> Summary of Percolation Test Results. <br /> Boring No. Date Tested Percolation Test Percolation Rate Test Duration Comments <br /> Depth(feet) (minutes/inch) (minutes) <br /> B14 06/19/19 25 17.85 30 Satisfactory <br /> B15 06/19/19 25 83.33 30 Unsatisfactory ` <br /> B16 06/19/19 25 1.51 60 Satisfactory <br /> B17 06/20/19 25 11.9 30 Satisfactory <br /> B18 06/20/19 25 62.50 30 Unsatisfactory <br /> i <br /> B19 06/20/19 25 250 30 Unsatisfactory, j <br /> B20 06/2019 25 0.83 60 Unsatisfactory <br /> 0 <br /> B21 06/19/19 25 1.41 60 Satisfactory <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.