My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0002434
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
BRUELLA
>
0
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
UP-89-18
>
SU0002434
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2021 3:48:20 PM
Creation date
4/17/2020 10:30:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0002434
PE
2626
FACILITY_NAME
UP-89-18
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
BRUELLA
ENTERED_DATE
10/26/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
BRUELLA
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ttem No . 5 <br /> PC : 5-18-89 <br /> UP-89--18 <br /> Page 1 <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Use Permit <br /> :0,plication No. UP-89-18 based upon the inability to make <br /> Findings No . 2 and 3 . <br /> FINDINGS <br /> 1 . The establishment , maintenance, and operation of the use does <br /> not conflict with the General Plan because the project is <br /> permissible under the C-RC zone, which is the implementation <br /> lona for the site ' s General Plan designation, Retail <br /> Commercial . <br /> 2 . Adequate utilities, access roads, sanitation, drainage, and <br /> ether necessary facilities have not been provided, and the <br /> proposed improvements are not properly related to existing <br /> and proposed streets and highways . The site plan does not <br /> conform to the five-foot dedication/improvement required <br /> along Second Street , nor does it conform to the clear-view- <br /> at--intersection requirement (Section 9-3233) of the Planning <br /> Title . Without a revised plan that conforms to street and <br /> intersection requirements, it cannot be determined that the <br /> proposed improvements are either adequate or properly related <br /> to County requirements. Without further review, it is not <br /> possible to determine whether the revised plan would provide <br /> an adequate sewage disposal system. <br /> 3 . The property involved is not of adequate size and shape to <br /> accommodate the proposed use and all yards , building <br /> coverage, setbacks, parking areas, and other requirements of <br /> this Title. Based ori the proposed site plan, the project <br /> does not comply with setback or parking requirements because <br /> the building would be located within ten feet of the planned <br /> right-of-way line along Second Street , and the handicap <br /> parking space would be located within the right-of -way. <br /> Without a revised site plan, it is not possible to conclude <br /> that the site is of adequate size and shape to meet Planning <br /> Title requirements. <br /> 4 . Issuance of the permit will not be significantly detrimental <br /> to the public health, safety, or welfare or be injurious the <br /> property or improvements of adjacent properties . The pro- <br /> posed use is similar to surrounding residential and commer- <br /> cial uses . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.