Laserfiche WebLink
DRAFT Ver. 1-C-doc-4-5-10 <br />Page 10 Tier II Qualified Facility SPCC Plan <br />10. Containment or Diversionary Structures or Equipment to Prevent Oil Discharge (§112.7(c)): <br />Table G-10 Containment and/or Diversionary Structures or Equipment <br />Appropriate secondary containment and/or diversionary structures or equipment <br />a is provided for all oil <br />handling containers, equipment, and transfer areas to prevent a discharge to navigable waters or <br />adjoining shorelines <br />b. The entire secondary containment system, including walls and floor, is capable of <br />containing oil and is constructed so that any discharge from a primary containment system, such as a tank <br />or pipe, will not escape the containment system before cleanup occurs.[§112.7(c)] <br />a Use one of the following methods of secondary containment or its equivalent: (1) Dikes, berms, or retaining walls sufficiently <br />impervious to contain oil; (2) Curbing; (3) Culverting, gutters, or other drainage systems; (4) Weirs, booms, or other barriers; (5) Spill <br />diversion ponds; (6) Retention ponds; or (7) Sorbent materials. <br />Except as noted below in footnote b for bulk storage containers and tanks (and loading/unloading racks), containment may be active or <br />passive indesign or operation, and the containmentmethod, design, and capacity need only address the typical failure mode, and the <br />most likely quantity of oil that would be discharged. <br />b Secondary containment for bulk storage containers and tanks must meet additional criteria (40 CFR 112.8(c) for stationary bulk <br />tanks/containers and 40 CFR 112.8(c)(11) for portable tanks/containers (see Section A of this Plan). Secondary containment for tank <br />truck/rail car loading or unloading racks must meet the criteria in 40 CFR 112.7(h)(1) (see Table G-15 of this Plan). <br />11. Containment Impracticability (§112.7(d)): <br />Table G-11 Determination of Impracticability and Provision of Alternative Measures N/A <br />This facility has determined that the installation of containment structures or pieces of equipment <br />required by/listed in §§112.7(c) and 112.7(h)(1), and §§112.8(c)(2), 112.8(c)(11), 112.9(c)(2), <br />112.10(c), 112.12(c)(2), and 112.12(c)(11) to prevent a discharge as described in §112.1(b) <br />a is not <br />practicable. For bulk storage containers, the facility will conduct both periodic integrity testing of the <br />containers and periodic integrity and leak testing of the valves and piping; and, unless a Facility <br />Response Plan has been submitted to US EPA under §112.20, attached to this plan is an oil spill <br />contingency plan following the provisions of 40 CFR part 109, and a written commitment of manpower, <br />equipment, and materials required to expeditiously control and remove any quantity of oil discharged <br />that may be harmful.[§112.7(d)] <br />The determination that secondary containment is impracticable and provisions in lieu of secondary <br />containment have been reviewed and certified in writing by a Professional Engineer. The PE review and <br />certification must be included with this Plan.[§§112.6(b)(3)(ii) and 112.7(d)] <br />The following is a clear explanation of why such containment structures or measures are not practicable: <br />a A “discharge as described in §112.1(b)” generally means a discharge of oil in harmful quantities to a navigable water of the Unites <br />States. A harmful quantity is the amount of oil which could cause a sheen upon the water, create an emulsion, or deposit a sludge <br />upon the shoreline. ‘Navigable waters of the United States” may include storm drain systems and culverts. <br />Facility Name: <br />x <br />x <br />x <br />x <br />CALIFORNIA FREIGHT ACAMPO