Laserfiche WebLink
r f <br /> f <br /> 30 August 2004 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 99-0592 <br /> Page 11 of 13 <br /> Since initiation of ground water monitoring in November 1999,ground water elevations have ranged ' <br /> I from approximately 25 2 to 44 4 feet below mean sea level The ground water table underlying thef <br /> site is generally flat and toward the northeast with a low gradient of less than 0 01 ft/ft (Figure �M'11 <br /> _� vY,, aoo4- --)vd4-o SW, 'I] <br /> Laboratory analysis of ground water samples detected petroleum hydrocarbon-imp4c ed water at the <br /> former USTs T-1 and T-2 locations (at borings MW-1 and B-2), only MTBE at 9 µg7l`r as detected <br />' at the western edge of the site (boring B-5) However, the detected concentrations in ground water MT-AL' <br /> samples collected from the former UST location (e g , MW-1)have remained stable since grounds 6 <br /> water monitoring began in November 1999, indicating that further migration of hydrocarbons from ha it*__ <br /> the source area is not occurring Furthermore, analytes of concern have not been detected above <br /> laboratory reporting limits in ground water samples collected from perimeter monitoring wells <br /> MW-2,MW-3 and MW-4 over the length ofthe quarterly monitoring and sampling events conducted <br /> to date The lateral extent of ground water contamination appears to be limited to the former UST <br /> area (MW-1) <br /> Typically, ground water would represent the migration medium for contaminants over significant <br /> horizontal distances However, sites located in up-gradient or cross-gradient directions from the <br /> subject property are not likely to be negatively impacted by the subject property In addition, first <br /> encountered ground water is not used for drinking or irrigation, although all ground water in the <br /> State of California is considered to be of potential beneficial use <br /> Drinking water at and near the site is supplied by private wells Two on-site domestic wells (DW-1 <br /> and DW-2) were identified during a sensitive receptor survey conducted during the Fourth Quarter <br /> 1999, DW-1 is located approximately 140 feet north and DW-2 was located approximately 90 feet <br /> southeast of the former UST system DW-2 reportedly had been out of service since 1978 due to <br /> sand infiltration problems and was destroyed under EHD oversight in December 2000 Groundwater <br /> in well DW-1 is sampled each quarter, and to date analytical results have been non-detect <br /> In addition to on-site well DW-1, ten other private wells and one public well were Identified within - <br /> a 2,000-foot radius of the site,the nearest off-site well is approximately 220 feet from the site Based <br /> on the lateral extent of contaminated ground water at the site, it is unlikely for off-site wells to be <br /> contaminated by impacted ground water from the site ' <br /> The subject property utilizes two septic systems, one is located approximately 90 feet east of the <br /> former UST system and the second system 1s located toward the front of the property,near the office <br /> Ibuilding, approximately 250 feet west of the former UST system Based on the lateral extent of <br /> contaminated soil and ground water,there is a low potential for the septic systems to act as conduits <br /> for subsurface migration of impacted ground water <br /> Advanced GeoEnviron mental,Inc <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I ' <br />