COMPLIANCE INFO - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ionudakis Firewood, Inc. Page 4 of 9 2. Approximately 150-gallons of water was released from the effluent pipe of CB #2 and captured in CB #3. The captured water was emptied into the Baker Tank, the trailer mounted baker tank refilled, and the equipment positioned on the next section of storm drain pipe. 3. Approximately 50-gallons of water was released from the effluent pipe of CB #4 and captured in CB #5. The captured water was emptied into the Baker Tank, the trailer mounted baker tank refilled, and the equipment positioned on the next section of storm drain pipe. 4. Approximately 200-gallons of water was released from the effluent pipe of CB #3 and captured in CB #4. Toward the end of the flush Mr. Vasquez collected a sample of the effluent water stream (Sample 2) following the procedures outlined in item 1 above. The captured water was emptied into the Baker Tank, the trailer mounted baker tank refilled, and the equipment positioned on the next section of storm drain pipe. 5. A sample of the supply well water was collected (Background) by opening the valve to allow a trickle of water and collecting samples in the appropriate containers. The containers were checked for headspace, uniquely labeled, temporarily stored in an ice chest refrigerated to a temperature of approximately 4°C pending delivery under chain of custody protocol to Argon for analysis. 6. Approximately 500-gallons of water was released from the effluent pipe of CB #5 and captured in the Pit. Toward the end of the flush Mr. Vasquez collected a sample of the effluent water stream (Sample 3) following the procedures outlined in item 1 above. The captured water was emptied into the Baker Tank, the trailer mounted baker tank refilled, and the equipment positioned on the next section of storm drain pipe. The remaining water in the Pit was pumped into the Baker Tank by Del-Tech. 7. The following morning Mr. Vazquez collected a sample from the Baker Tank by lowering a 4-foot bottom feed bailer into the tank and collecting a grab sample from approximately 3 feet below the surface. The sample was carefully transferred to the appropriate containers, checked for headspace, uniquely labeled, temporarily stored in an ice chest refrigerated to a temperature of approximately 4°C, and delivered under chain of custody protocol to Argon for analysis. Samples collected during the Storm Drain Test were analyzed for the following: • Total Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Diesel (TEPHd)by EPA method 8015M • Benzene, ethylbenzene,toluene, and total xylenes(BTEX)by EPA method 8021B • Upon verbal request the laboratory added TEPH as Kerosene (TEPHk) and TEPH as motor oil (TEPHmo) analysis by EPA method 8015M On February 24, 2010, after the EHD requested additional analysis of soil samples during the excavation phase of work, Mr. Vasquez collected another sample from the Baker Tank (indentified as Baker Tank 2) and carefully transferred the sample to the appropriate containers, checked for headspace, uniquely labeled, temporarily stored in an ice chest refrigerated to a temperature of approximately 4°C, and delivered under chain of custody protocol to Argon for analysis. G:IGROUNDZEILIONUDAKISIReportslSite Assessment and Excavation Report.doc March 2010