Laserfiche WebLink
*ionudakis Firewood, Inc. <br /> Page 9 of 9 <br /> 6.0 REFERENCES <br /> (CRWQCB, 1991), California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region, <br /> The Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan), Second Edition. <br /> (CRWQCB, 2008), California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay <br /> Region, Screening Levels for Environmental Concerns at Sites with Contaminated Soil <br /> and Groundwater Interim Final, November 2007(revised May 2008). <br /> (DWR, 1967), Department of Water Resources, Bulletin No. 146, San Joaquin County Ground <br /> Water Investigation, July 1967. <br /> Norris, R.M. and Webb, R.W., 1990. Geology of California 2"d Edition, John Wiley& Sons, Inc. <br /> NY, 1990. <br /> San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Lines of Equal Elevation of <br /> Water in Wells, Fall 1998. <br /> (USGS, 1986), U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper 1401-C, Geology of the Fresh <br /> Groundwater Basin of theCentral Valley, California, with Texture Maps and Sections. <br /> (USGS, 1989), U.S. Geological Survey, Professional Paper 1401-D, Groundwater Flow in the <br /> Central Valley, California. <br /> (USDA, 1992), U.S. Department of Agriculture — Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey of San <br /> Joaquin County, California,National Cooperative Soil Survey, October 1992. <br /> 7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> • Ground Zero has concluded that pressure washing the storm drain system would be <br /> unnecessary and cost prohibitive. <br /> • Ground Zero recommends the remaining soil be spread on-site. <br /> • Ground Zero recommends the remaining water from the storm drain test be released on-site. <br /> • Ground Zero recommends that the Site should receive a No Further Action Required <br /> notification from the County. <br /> G:IGROUNDZEILIONUDAKISlReportsisite Assessment and Excavation Report.doc March 2010 <br />