Laserfiche WebLink
IM <br /> 4Y u <br /> s . <br /> 70 <br /> d , <br /> _ OWENfw _ <br /> 4 <br /> FW , <br /> .w <br /> drilling was performed under the direction of a field <br /> geologist who maintained a continuous log of the materials <br /> encountered using the Unified Soil Classification System <br /> (Appendix I) . <br /> 2.2 Monitoring Wells <br /> The two soil borings were completed as two inch diameter <br /> ' monitoring wells. The wells were sited in the assumed <br /> downgradient direction based on previous monitoring. <br /> Specific details of the construction/ completion are <br /> included on the Individual logs (Appendix Y ) . Subsequent to <br /> completion, the wellheads of all wells were surveyed and <br /> elevations tied to a common datum. Water level <br /> j meazurements, summarized in Table 1, were taken after <br /> development using an interface probe In accordance with <br /> ._ WaterWork's Groundwater Monitoring Protocol (Appendix II) . <br /> No free product was noted in any of the wells. Water <br /> ^ samples were collected from wells MW3, MW4, MW5 and MW6 <br /> following Water Work's Groundwater Sampling Protocol <br /> (Appendix II) . The ' samples were analyzed for benzene, <br /> _. toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene, (BTEX) and total petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons (TPH) by EPA mdthods 8015 and 8020. <br /> 2.3 Tank Pit Sampling <br /> Six .5011 samples were collected from tank pit A, two from <br /> the floc.-. and one from Each wall. The samples were <br /> �- collected in accordance with WaterWork's Soil Sampling <br /> Protocol (Appendix II) . The pit floor samples were <br /> composited as well as the north and west walls and south and <br /> east walls. The three samples were analyzed for BTEX (EPA <br /> 8020) and TPH as gasoline (DOHS Method) . <br /> 3.0 FIELD INSPECTION <br /> The soils encountered during drilling consisted of clays, <br /> - sandy and gravely clays, and silty sands to 25 feet, the <br /> maximum depth explored. Field inspection did not note the <br /> presence of hydrocarbon odors in soils from the two borings. <br /> Groundwater was encountered at approximately 16 feet below <br /> grade <br /> and rose <br /> to <br /> approximately 8 feat after well <br /> completion. This rise in water level together with the <br /> lithology of the borings suggests that the first groundwater <br /> is confined or semi--confined at this site. The groundwater <br /> gradient, calculated from the April 13, 1985 monitoring is a <br /> .3 percent in a westerly direction (Figure 3) . <br /> Laboratory.-,analysis--of..sol l..-samples--collected -from tank ..-.pit <br /> A did not record concentrations of gasoline hydrocarbons <br /> above method detection limits. The laboratory reports and <br /> chain-of-custody form are presented in Appendix III. <br /> Laboratory analysis of groundwater samples reccrded <br /> k <br /> all 21 111 <br />