Laserfiche WebLink
13 February 2006 <br /> Appendix A- Site Background <br /> Page 4 of 4 <br /> On 10 and 11 October 2005 four on-site ground watermomtoring wells(MW-101 through MW-104) <br /> were installed Soil pilot borings MW101 through MW104 were completed as ground water <br /> monitoring wells using two-inch diameter PVC casing with 0 020-inch slotted screen installed from <br /> approximately 20 feet to 40 feet bsg with blank casing extended to the surface The filter pack(No <br /> 3 Lonestar sand) was installed from approximately 18 feet to 40 feet bsg <br /> The soil borings advanced for wells MW-101 through MW-104 were comprised of fine-grained <br /> sediments and a ground water table within coarse sands Generally brown silty sand was encountered <br /> from surface grade to approximately 30 feet bsg A coarse poorly graded sand was present in the soil <br /> borings at a depth of 35 feet bsg to 40 feet bsg A silt layer was encountered from approximately 10 <br /> to 15 feet bsg in the eastern monitoring well pilot borings Saturated soil was encountered at 30 feet <br /> bsg <br /> A California state-licensed surveying engineer from Baumbach & Piazza, Inc of Lodi, California <br /> surveyed the elevation of monitoring wells MW-101 through MW-104 The elevation at the top of <br /> the well casing was surveyed to the nearest 0 1-foot The elevations of wells MW-101 through MW- <br /> 104 were determined to be 60 80 feet, 60 72 feet, 57 11 feet and 57 95 feet above mean sea level <br /> (MSL), respectively <br /> The well were developed and sampled on 17 October 2005 A Solinst water level meter was used <br /> to measure the depth to ground water in monitoring wells MW-101 through MW-104 relative to the <br /> tops of the well casings, prior to any well purging The ground water elevations and gradient were <br /> determined from these data Monitoring wells MW-101 through MW-104 were developed utilizing <br /> a stainless steel hand bailer and an inertia pump Ground water was purged from each monitoring <br /> well until ground water was visually sediment free Twenty-four to thirty gallons of water were <br /> removed from wells MW-101,MW-103 and MW-104,representing ten volumes of the typical well <br /> water column purged from the wells, suggesting adequate recharge in these wells Ten gallons were <br /> purged from MW-102 before the well was pumped dry, representing approximately four volumes <br /> of the water column, indicating low recharge rates in this well <br /> The initial depth to ground water during the October 2005 monitoring event ranged from 22 94 feet <br /> (MW-103) to 26 56 feet (MW-102) below the tops of the well casings and the ground water flow <br /> direction was inferred to be north to northeast Additionally, the data provided from the initial <br /> sampling event indicated that VOCs were not detected in the ground water samples from the wells <br /> at Ripon Farm Service Additionally,chlorinated pesticides,herbicides,ammonia and nitrates were <br /> not detected in the ground water samples collected from monitoring wells MW-101 through <br /> MW-104 at RFS The pH values were normal for groundwater in the shallow alluvial areas <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />