Laserfiche WebLink
' 12 December 2005 <br /> AGE-NC. Project No. 95-4137 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> 22. - COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> t <br /> Ground water samples were collected from the purged wells using new disposable plastic bailers <br /> after allowing the wells to achieve a minimum 80% recovery of the pre-purge water volume. <br /> Each sample was transferred into three, 40-milliliter (ml) EPA-approved volatile organic analysis <br /> (VOA)vials and into one 1-liter amber bottle. Samples were properly labeled, stored in a chilled <br /> container, and transported under chain of custody to Cal Tech Environmental Laboratories <br /> (CTEL), a California Department'of Health Services (DHS)-certified laboratory, for analysis. <br /> Each sample was analyzed for: <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline and diesel (TPH-g and TPH-d, <br /> respectively) in accordance with EPA Method 8015 Modified; and <br /> ' Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX)'and fuel oxygenates methyl <br /> tertiary-butyl ether(MTBE), tertiary-butyl alcohol (TBA),di-isopropyl ether (DIPS), . <br /> ' ethyl tertiary-butyl ether(ETBE),tertiary-amyl methyl ether (TAME), 1,2-dibromoethane <br /> (EDB), and 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) in accordance with EPA Method 8260B. <br /> 3.0, FINDINGS <br /> ' Ground water elevation, flow direction, and gradient were determined from field data collected . <br /> on 17 August 2005.and;the contaminant impact to ground water was quantified from laboratory <br /> data. <br /> 3.1. GROUNDWATER GRADIENT AND FLOW DIRECTION <br /> Depths to ground water during the August 2005 monitoring event ranged from 23.09 feet (MW- <br /> 3)to 25.68 feet (MW-9) below the tops of the well casings; the depth to ground water decreased <br /> approximately 0.9 feet since t��Wfy 2005 qu erly monitoring event. The calculated ground <br /> water elevations ranged fromgg��feet(MW,� to 33.68 feet (MW-6); which was an average 7 <br /> ' ground water elevation calculated. The ground water flow direction was inferred to be west to <br /> northwest, at a ground water gradient of 0.0009 foot/foot(ft/ft) across the farmer'UST release <br /> area(Figure 3). <br /> 3.2. ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> tTPH-d were detected in the ground water samples from two on-site wells at Ripon Farm Service. <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmentaf,Inc. <br />