Laserfiche WebLink
<' <br /> { <br /> KK <br /> NEI <br /> i <br /> Project Number; SFf3-175.0204.72 <br /> I. Consultant Protect Number: iSOW-250-044 <br /> Contract Number: N48CwCO244.9-X <br /> Facility Number: 98455 <br /> Work order Number: 00098387 <br /> t" Report Issue oate: September 20,1990 <br /> fs QA Conformance Summary <br /> Purgeable Aromatics and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons <br /> as Gasoline in Soil <br /> EPA Method 8020/8015 <br /> I � <br /> 1.0 Plank-5 <br /> I Five of target compounds were below detection limits in the reagent water blank and reagent <br /> methanol blank as shown in Tables 2a and 2b. <br /> a i-n 2.0n n nt h k m 1 <br /> r <br /> The control limits were met for 4 out of 4 QC check compounds as shown In Table 3. <br /> 3,0 Surrogate Comp nd Recoygirligs <br /> Percent recovery limits were met for the surrogate compound(naphthalene)for all samples <br /> as shown in Table 4. <br /> t . <br /> on <br /> 4.0 trix ik M n M trlx° ik D 1f iA D A r n Pr i i <br /> ! 4.1 Percent recovery limits were met tar 4 of 4 compounds In the MS and MSD aj shown in Table <br /> 4.2 Relative percent difference(RPD)criteria was met for 4 of 4 analytes in the IVIS and MSD as <br /> r' shown in Table 5. <br /> 5.0 mI Hnlin <br /> 5.1 Sample handling and holding time criteria were met for all samples. <br /> 5.2 There were no exceptional conditions requiring dilution of samples. <br /> i , <br /> CW938'f.000'CA <br /> Page 3 of 7 . <br /> �. <br /> . �. IASOQROFOR'I fESN <br />