Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br /> aLZ <br /> Project Number: SF -175-0204.72 <br /> Consultant Protect Number: 1600,250.0144 <br /> r Contract Number: N46CwCO24a-9-x <br /> Facility Number: 9.6155 <br /> t'M Work Order Number: mbar 27,1990 <br /> 4 <br /> Report Issue Date: Sep <br /> �.A <br /> CA Conformance Summary <br /> f; Purgeable Aromatics and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons <br /> as Gasoline In Soil <br /> SPA Method 8020/8015 <br /> 14 <br /> i <br /> i' 1.6 8- lank <br /> Five of 5 target compoundswere below detection limits in the reagent water blank and reagent <br /> i' methanol blank as shown in Tables 2a and 2b. <br /> t-r <br /> i s 2.p Inde endent QC Check Sam ie <br /> l R The control limits were met for 4 out of 4O check compounds as shown in Table 3. <br /> a <br /> 3.0 r ,.. r,aeG r�maound Recoveries <br /> percent recovery limits were met for the surrogate compound(naphthalene)for all samples <br /> as shown in Table 4. <br /> saPr i I n <br /> 4.01 M t ix ik M n M trix ik IMP= M D Acc <br /> t;1 4,1 Percent recovery limits were met for 4 of 4 compounds In the MS and MSD as shown in Table <br /> {S 5. <br /> 4.2 Relative percent difference(RPD)criteria was met for 4 of 4 analytes in the MS and MSD as <br /> shown in Table 5. <br /> 5.0 Sample Handling- <br /> 5.1 Sample handling and hoiding time criteria were met for all samples. <br /> 5,2 Thera were no exceptional conditions requiring dilution of samples. <br /> f > <br /> Lip <br /> tv <br /> t1 Page 3 017 <br /> �J C0095TEL 24.DOC GA <br /> I , f E <br /> i - - ENV I I?O N u t N r A. - <br /> .. J LAEOPAt<)ALES. INC. <br />