Laserfiche WebLink
4$ <br /> I <br /> • l <br /> p[cieclNumber. SF�77`��•72 <br /> consultant Prolrtt Number: 1600a2 � <br /> Cp".0 Number. N46G�NCO2�44-�X <br /> Facility Number 9-61017b <br /> wcReport Issue Date: Ottober 10,1990 <br /> CA Conformance Summary <br /> Purgeable Aromatics and <br /> Total <br /> Pet Soil <br /> um Hydrocarbons <br /> s Gasolinein <br /> EPA Method 8020/8015 <br /> 1.0 BII wdetectionlimttsinthereagentwaterblankandreagent <br /> l=ive of 5 target Show <br /> compounds were below <br /> methanol blank as shown In Tables 2a and 2b. <br /> �. i <br /> 2•p lnde endent QC Check Sam I ounds as shown in Table 3. <br /> The control limits were inet for 4 aut of 4 CC check comp <br /> 3.0 ^ 'rr^mat rnmoo n R v n ate compound(naphthalene)for all samples <br /> f° <br /> Percent recovery Ilmifs were met for the surrog <br /> as shown 4n Table 4. Y <br /> ikm M n M trix ik p IE t IMSU A <br /> n Pr n <br /> Il rix ounds in the MS and MSD as shown in Table <br /> 4.0 I <br /> ,. 4 1 Percent recovery limits were met for 4 of 4 comp <br /> 5' ytes in the MS and MSD as <br /> criteria was met for 4 of 4 anal <br /> 4.2 Relative percent difference (RPD} <br /> shown in Table S. <br /> 5.0 can,pie dl 9n les. <br /> 5.1 Sample handling and holding time criteria were met for all camp <br /> 5.2 There were no exceptional conditions requiring dilution of samples. <br /> Page 3 of 7 i <br /> G+TTET Cancocnd.CA <br /> . G710t78.D�C - <br /> GTEL <br /> EHSN y t N 7 A L <br /> vOO - <br /> - - LA�pcA1G TlE 5. INC - <br />