Laserfiche WebLink
RNAL RSWEDiATM PLAN <br /> 14800 West Frontage Road Manteca California <br /> 2.8 A uifer Analysis Test <br /> Rising head tests (slug tests) were performed in monitoring wells MW-4 and MW-7 on <br /> July 3, 1991, to estimate the hydraulic conductivity (K) of the water-bearing horizon in the <br /> immediate vicinity of the monitoring wells In preparation for the test, a pressure <br /> transducer was placed in the selected well and connected to an "Aqua Star" datalogger <br /> which recorded the changes in water level over time The test consisted of dropping a <br /> 5-foot-long, 3-inch-diameter PVC pipe (slug), capped at both ends and filed with clean <br /> sand, into the well and allowing the water level in the well to stabilize The slug was then <br /> quickly removed from the well and the changes in the water level recorded until such time <br /> as the water levels in the well stabilized (rising head) <br /> A software package entitled "Agtesoly" (Geraghty and Miller Inc , 1989) was used to <br /> analyze the data Aqtesolv consists of a curve drawing and matching program The data <br /> is analyzed by plotting the time and change in groundwater elevation on the appropriate <br /> log or semi-log paper, then matching the data with the appropriate published "type <br /> curves." The method of analysis depends on site-specific hydrogeologic conditions, both <br /> man-made and naturally occurring <br /> The method used to analyze the data at the subject site was the Bouwer and Rice slug <br /> test method for unconfined aquifers (Bouwer, et al , 1976) The values for K ranged from <br /> 1 5 x 10' to 9 7 x 10' feet per minute (ft/mm) The data and assumptions made in <br /> analyzing the data are included in Appendix F <br /> I The method used to analyze the potential pumping rate of the aquifer (Q) was the Duput <br /> equation (Duput, J , 1863) The values for Q ranged from 0 05 to 6 04 gallons per minute <br /> (gpm) The data and assumptions made in analyzing the data are included in <br /> Appendix F <br /> 3.0 FINAL REMEDIATION PLAN <br /> 3.1 Remedial Action Technology Selectlon <br /> IThe selected remediation technologyfor this site will remove and destroy petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons from both soil and groundwater by using an internal combustion (IC) <br /> engine, a power take off, a vacuum pump, air compressor, and a water pump <br /> Petroleum hydrocarbons in soil will be removed by vapor extraction Groundwater <br /> extraction will create a cone of depression on the groundwater surface, ensuring <br /> containment and recovery of the hydrocarbons in groundwater, and also exposing <br /> additional soil to the vapor extraction system <br /> 90-097A FRP -7- <br />