Laserfiche WebLink
t <br /> to 31 October 2005 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 03-1080 <br /> Page 2 of 10 <br /> been completely defined, but are believed to be of metamorphic and igneous origins <br /> The Modesto, Riverbank, and Turlock Lake Formations and overlying Recent alluvium are the <br /> principal sources of domestic ground water in the 13,500-square mile San Joaquin Valley Ground ` <br /> ' Water Basin (Basin 5-22) The nearest surface water feature to the site is the San Joaquin River, <br /> located approximately 5 miles west of the site According to previous site investigations, ground <br /> water is located at approximately 30 feet to 35 feet below surface grade (bsg), and flows under a <br /> ' northeast-trending hydraulic gradient,however,ground water elevation and gradient may vary both <br /> locally and seasonally <br /> ry <br /> 212 SITE HISTORY <br /> ' According to records on file with the San Joaquin Country Environmental Health Department <br /> (EHD), the subject property was formerly part of San Joaquin County's Local Oversight Program <br /> (LOP)for the investigation of leaking underground storage tanks In late 1988 and early 1989,four <br /> ground water monitoring wells (MW-1 through MW-4) were installed to total depths ranging <br /> between 40 feet and 50 feet bsg Contamination was detected in soil and ground water samples <br /> 1 • collected during the well installation <br /> In November 1989,three 10,000-gallon gasoline USTs(regular,unleaded,and diesel)were removed, <br /> ' with soil excavated to 17 feet bsg The tanks were noted to,be in good condition, but hydrocarbon <br /> odor and discoloration were present in surrounding soil All soil samples collected at 17 feet bsg <br /> confirmed contamination <br /> In November 1989 and June 1992, five additional ground water monitoring wells (MW-5 through <br /> MW-9) were installed to approximately 40 feet bsg Quarterly ground water monitoring events <br /> ' occurred from April 1992 to November 1997 Ground water samples collected from monitoring <br /> wells MW-1 through MW-4 were consistently impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons Occasional <br /> detections of petroleum hydrocarbons occurred in monitoring wells MW-5 through MW-8 <br /> Monitoring well MW-9 remained free of contamination throughout the monitoring period Analytical <br /> ' results of ground water samples collected from April 1992 to November 1997 are included in <br /> Appendix A <br /> In October 1990,remediation at the site was initiated with the installation of soil venting components <br /> in the former UST pit From January 1995 to November 1996, soil vapor extraction and ground <br /> ' water extraction systems operated on the site,extracting approximately 2,391 8 pounds(lbs)of total <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g) and 8 17 lbs of benzene It was estimated <br /> that 0 068 lbs ofinethyltertiary-butyl ether(MTBE),0 032 lbs of 1,2-dichloroethane(1,2-DCA),and <br /> 0 56 lbs of total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as diesel(TPH-d)remained in the ground water, <br /> while an estimated 0 01 lbs of 1,2-DCA remained in soil when remediation was halted Apex <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />