My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2004 - 2007
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
1711
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231455
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2004 - 2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2020 12:14:14 PM
Creation date
5/1/2020 9:04:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2004 - 2007
RECORD_ID
PR0231455
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003612
FACILITY_NAME
Yosemite Avenue Arco AmPm
STREET_NUMBER
1711
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
Ave
City
Manteca
Zip
95336
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1711 E Yosemite Ave
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
337
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Monitoring System Certificatiox <br /> ~Site Address: '6020: 1711 E YOSEMITE,MANTECA,CA 95336 _ Date of ervicin <br /> -- ------- —_ —. g: <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version Insta r 7 ©/ -� <br /> Com to the follow checklist: <br /> Y] No* Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> VT'Y Cj' No* Is the visual alarm o !rational? <br /> [] No* Were all sensors visually inspected,functionally tested, and confirmed operational? <br /> es No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipmentwid <br /> not interfere with their proper operation? <br /> Yes L N If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g modem; <br /> M'A/A operational? <br /> Yes No* For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> Is <br /> ftj NIA monitoring system detects a leak,fails to operate rs electrically disconnect! If yes: which sensors initiate <br /> positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) ump/TrenchSensors; 1"spenser CorAAinmentSensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leeks=4 sensor feilureldisconnection? es; ENO. <br /> p Yes No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary teak overfill warning device (i.e. no <br /> !A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> hlI oin s and operatingproLerl If so at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? .. ..% <br /> es* No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes,identify specific sensors,probes,or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement pads in Section M below. <br /> Yes* o Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all thc�apply) <br /> Product; Iff Water. If yes, describe causes in SectionF,below. <br /> No* Was monitoringsystem set-upreviewed to ensure Eopet settin s? <br /> esj No* Is all monitorin.g a ui mentoperational per manufacturer's s ecifications? <br /> In Section E below,describe kow and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments`----- ---- -- --------------__—�._------------• <br /> ��] �r�i1�.11'„�- .g2.r r.� �-f2)l ����!....J/ f7` TrCif��•Y r' 1 <br /> Cr <br /> —re Lc k do rc4r'— 14 -1 � <br /> I <br /> i <br /> i <br /> i <br /> i <br /> i <br /> i <br /> Page 2 of 03MI <br /> ActiveReports Evaluation. Copyright 2002-2003 (c)Data Dynamics, Ltd.All Rights Reserved. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.