WORK PLANS - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

i.' JAR Client: G. R. Kause QCI# 1-95-314 Project: 22107 Hwy 120 - Sexton @ Hwy 120 - Escalon, CA Page: 2 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TESTS I. Maximum Density and Optimum Moisture Determinations Test Method CAL 216 MAXIMUM OPTIMUM WET DENSUY MOISTURE MATERIAL NO. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION LOCATION LBS I FT__ PERCENT I Med. Br. Silty Sand/Sm Rock Import Soil 132.4 12.0 2 Lt. Br. Silty Sand/Gravel Native Soil 141.7 9.1 11 Field Density Test Results: DEPTH FIELD SPECIFIED BELOW FIELD RELATIVE RELATIVE FINISHED MOISTURE FIELD WET DENSITY DENSITY TEST APPROXIMATE GRADE MATERIAL PERCENT DENSITY COMPACTION COMPACTION NO TEST LOCA'T'ION INCHES NO WET WT LBS/FT %OF MAX % MAIC Tests taken in the Pit Backfill Area Date tested: 12/07/95 Native Soil 1 10'+ Below Finished Grade 0 - 8" 2 9.3 127.1 89.7 90 2 8'+ Below Finished Grade 0 - 811 2 10.8 135.0 95.3 90 Import Soil 3 6'+ Below Finished Grade' 0 - 811 1 11.1119.7 90.4 90 4 5'+ Below Finished Grade 0 - 8" 1 13.7 124.1 93.7 90 Tests taken in the Pit Backfill Area Date tested: 12/08/95 Import Soil I 4.0'Below Finished Grade 0 - 8" I NIA 119.9 90.6 90 2 2.0'Below Finished Grade 0 - 8" 1 N/A 121.7 91.9 90 Native Soil 3 At Finished Grade 0 - 8" 2 N/A 128.8 90.9 90 The site preparatiarr, fill placement and campactin operations were completed by the time our field personae were called to the project site. In absence oontrrnrous observations by aur personnel at the site, this report does not express an opinion as to the adegrrac of the site preparation, or the uniformity off"' placement and compaction nor on the adequacy of the rl!to perform its intended function. We have employed acceptable engineering and testing procedures. We do not however, undertake the guarantee of construction nor do we relieve the contractor of his primary responsibility to produce a completed project conforming to the project plans, specifications mid applicable building codes. a• ��iildi� n�1fRl� �nslae{"m