Laserfiche WebLink
. 27 November 2000 <br /> I AGE-NC Project No 98-0520 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> I22 COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> Water samples were collected from each well using a new disposable plastic bailer Each water <br /> sample was transferred into three 40-mI volatile organic analysis(VOA)vials contauuug 0 5 m1 18% <br /> HCl as a sample preservative and into one 1-liter amber bottle without preservative After collection, <br /> the samples were labeled and placed in a chilled container for transportation under chain-of-custody <br /> to McCampbell Analytical Laboratory(MAI) of Pacheco, California Each sample was analyzed for <br /> I • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline and diesel (TPH-g and TPH-d) in <br /> accordance with EPA Method 8015 Modified and <br /> • Volatile aromatic compounds - benzene, toluene, ethyl-benzene and total xylenes (BTEX), <br /> Iand oxygenate compounds - di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tertiary-butyl ether (ETBE), <br /> ethanol, methyl-tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), tertiary-amyl methyl ether (TAME), tertiary- <br /> butanol (TBA), methanol, ethanol, ethylene dbromide (EDB) and 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2- <br /> DCA) in accordance with EPA Method 8260 Modified <br /> • 3.0 FINDINGS <br /> I Ground water elevation and flow direction were calculated from field data, the hydrocarbon impact <br /> to ground water was assessed by laboratory analysis <br /> 3 1 GROUND WATER ELEVATION FLOW DIRECTION AND GRADIENT <br /> Depth to ground water at the site ranged from 11 41 to 12 13 feet below the well casing tops The <br /> ground water elevations at the site ranged from 87 21 feet to 87 41 feet above mean sea level(n sl) <br /> The ground water elevation decreased approxunately 1 64 feet since the last momtormg event <br /> The groundwater flow direction and gradient were determmed from the ground water elevation data <br /> Contours ofthe groundwater elevation data indicates that the groundwater flow was directedtoward <br /> the northeast from the former UST area The ground water gradient on site was calculated to be <br /> 0 0029 under the former UST Figure 3 illustrates the contoured ground water elevations <br /> I <br /> 3 2 HYDROCARBON-IMPACTED GROUND WATER <br /> Ile TPH-d was detected in ground water sample collected and analyzed from well MW-3 at a <br /> concentration of 77 micrograms per liter (µg/1) MTBE was detected in the ground water samples <br /> I collected and analyzed from wells MW-i and MW-4 at concentrations of 4 2 µg/1 and 1 3 µg/l, <br /> respectively <br />