Laserfiche WebLink
_ ,. r L Y '� 3y.- .- - -''1 _ � -`_t• f _ rs f Crag 3_¢ '_�..� it �- .: <br /> 25 October 1997 {, -; �, s z, i r ,. `• <br /> AGE=NC-Project'No. 97-03'61 Y �, <br /> Page 6 of 6 A t y 1 '' Y. <br /> l' <br /> -believe'that the impacted soil remainirig'on the'slte poses a significant risk to groundwater .'f _ <br /> beneath the site x • <br /> 5'- } �. n r .' . "'t'" _ Vii{'. .,,.Sri t• `t { P .:� <br /> a <br /> 6.0. RECOMMENDATIONS '+ <br /> Bused on the results of this'investigation, AGE recoinrriends <br />-Y - - _ i ._ S.- ' .L -� _ ,.^ _ .,��Y .. - . _;'fi - _ y. Y - -, i; - `kms. .-c "",x -,.s.l• ..� .- <br />' i�• -No further investigation should be required at`the.sIte'-A certified closure should be issued .' <br /> from the PHS-EHD.:: <br /> 7.0. LIMITATIONS <br /> l Our professional services were performed using that degree of,care and skill ordinarily exercised by 11 r t x <br /> . . ;. , <br /> JL <br /> 7 - environmental consultants practicing in this or similar,localities.The finding"s were based mainly { <br /> _ upon,analytical. results provided'by•'an independentlaboratory:.:Evafiiationsof$ttie geologic <br /> conditions at the site have been made-from a lirnitcd,-number.of available data points 1e:.-soil boring ' <br /> and limited soil'and groundwater samples), and subsurface,conditions--may vary away•from-these <br /> - data poirits. '�No .other.. warranty; expressed or'.•implied;:`..:is :rriade. -as to the '--professional <br /> rec'onunendatioris contained' this report <br /> i _ .x -_ >^ ••�-- c r t a' p'JN�, Y"'c-r' 7 2 .,r- '1. <br /> IV <br /> x <br /> 4r �-! cY 3, f- T. � �,=_ ' .g hs i '"� `•r ._� Y - a � K ;.- '# � `��,� .� rI. } ,F -_ ,, <br /> s , <br /> t <br /> d <br /> t' _ 1 _ � 3 -: .�•♦ .,tom, } r. <br /> , i - n� --,: -y - s - [ � ' -' •sem # Ik `` j3, t- 7--. <br /> `r -} - AdtiancedGeoEniirvnmenta! Inc. �� <br />