Laserfiche WebLink
A Mlv--13 />< <br /> projected 12 L � ~ � <br /> 6 <br /> feet son h _ U <br /> M <br /> projected lI V s <br /> CF?T5 <br /> feet south CPT4 r� <br /> projected 11 CPT3 <br /> feet north projected 8 projected 6 Q) w q <br /> feet north feet north <br /> 10' <1 - - - - - - - - - 10, 0 <br /> 20' - <1 - - 20 w <br /> 30' DQ <br /> 30' z <br /> 40' r _ 44' Q <br /> trl, <1 C'a'r 91at <br /> A <br /> 50> 50' �� a <br /> 70' - - - - - - 70' els' <br /> V 0' -- __ <br /> Sa <1 <br /> 90'-- sP 1.5 - - -- - - _ 90' <br /> r <br /> 100' ��ts� = _. - - - 100' F11 W <br /> CO W <br /> 110' CD <br /> l 11 Q' <br /> 120, 120' <br /> 130' \ --130' a <br /> - o E---, 0 <br /> 140'- - - - 140' W F- <br /> 150'1150 <br /> - <br /> 150' 150U ro � <br /> 1Totes: <br /> LEGEND mg/kg: milligrams per kilogram p <br /> SM/SP: SILTY SAND AND POORLY GRADED SANDS TPH—g: Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline CQ <br /> CPT: Cone penetration test boring location (2002 & 2004) <br /> C� ML: SILT (WITH CLAY) MW.* Monitoring hell location (1993 to 2009) <br /> 77 CL: C.LAY5 SILT CLAY •*Lithology and lithologlo contacts are approximate. <br /> .I ( - Lithology is based on cone penetration test borings <br /> A roximate Depth to Water advanced at the site in 2002 & 2004 by Fugro <br /> pP P Geosciences and Gregg Drilling. <br /> 1.2 TPH--g concentration in soil reported in mg/kg ***Minor adjustment have been made to the cross <br /> 0 <1 TP13--g concentration below laboratory reporting limits of 1 mg/kg section based on field observations. <br /> ••"Contaminant contours are generalized based on soil <br /> Monitoring well screening interval analytical data collected at the site to date. <br /> SCALE <br /> D 30 60 <br /> FEFI` <br />