My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0009570
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PARK
>
248
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0542235
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0009570
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/4/2020 3:14:29 PM
Creation date
5/4/2020 2:34:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0009570
RECORD_ID
PR0542235
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024262
FACILITY_NAME
CANEPA CAR WASH
STREET_NUMBER
248
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
PARK
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
13906035
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
248 E PARK ST
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Site Background <br /> Canepa's Car Wash, Park Street <br /> Page 4 of 7 <br /> well collar measuring points on April 4, 2003, approximately 0 25 feet less <br /> (greater in elevation) <br /> previous quarter The groundwater elevation contours indicated that the t the <br /> generally toward the northeast, consistent with historical groundwater gradientoundwater gradient was <br /> Quarterly groundwater monitoring activities were conducted on July 10, 2003 The laboratory analytical <br /> results for the groundwater samples collected from MW-I, MW-3, MW-4, MW-6, and MW-7 indicated <br /> that BTEX constituents were not detected at or above laboratory reported detection limits in those <br /> samples BTEX constituents were detected at a moderate concentration in the sample collected from MW- <br /> 2, and at relatively elevated concentrations in the samplefrom MW-5 TPH-G was detected m MW-2, <br /> MW-3, and MW-5, at concentrations of 6 2, 0 063, and 49 rn <br /> Laboratory analytical <br /> results indicated that MTBE was detected at a concentration of 400 µg/Li n g/L resively MW_and that MTBE was <br /> not detected at or above an elevated detection limit of 500 p,g/L in the groundwater sample collected from <br /> MW-5 Because he result for the MW-2 sample was inconsistent with historical results and the detection <br /> limit for the MW-5 sample was elevated, the samples were re-analyzed for MTBE by EPA Method <br /> 8260B The results of the EPA Method 8260B analyses indicated that MTBE was not detected in he <br /> samples from MW-2 and MW-5 at or above the laboratory reported detection lima of 5 0 µg/L The <br /> laboratory analytical results of the groundwater samples collected on July 10, 2003, were generally <br /> consistent with historical monitoring results <br /> The groundwater table remained above he top of all well screens during the July 2003 monitoring event <br /> The average depth to groundwater in he monitor wells was approximately 26 98 feet below the surveyed <br /> well collar measuring points on July 10, 2003, 0 37 feet deeper than the previous quarter The <br /> groundwater elevation contours indicated that the groundwater gradient was generally toward the <br /> northeast, consistent with historical groundwater gradients <br /> Quarterly groundwater monitoring activities were con <br /> p ducted on November 6, 2003 The laboratory <br /> analytical results for the <br /> groundwater samples collected from MW-1, MW-4, MW-6, and MW-7 indicated <br /> that BTEX constituents were not detected at or above laboratory reported detection limits m hose <br /> samples BTEX constituents were detected at a low concentration in the sample collected from MW-3, at <br /> moderate concentrations in the sample collected from MW-2, and at relatively elevated concentrations in <br /> the sample from MW-5 TPH-G was detected in MW-2, MW-3, and MW-5, at concentrations of 11, 0 14, <br /> and 50 mg/L, respectively Laboratory analytical results indicated that MTBE was detected at a <br /> concentration of 1,100 ug/L in MW-2 and that MTBE was not detected at or above an elevated detection <br /> limit of I,000 pg/L in the groundwater sample collected from MW-5 Because the result for he MW-2 <br /> sample was inconsistent with historical results and the detection limit for the MW-5 sample was elevated, <br /> he samples were re-analyzed for MTBE by EPA Method 8260E The results of the EPA Method 8260B <br /> analyses indicated that MTBE was not detected in the samples from MW-2 and MW-5 at or above the <br /> laboratory reported detection limits of 0 5 and 5 0 pg/L, respectively The laboratory analytical results of <br /> he groundwater samples collected on November 6, 2003 were generally consistent with historical <br /> monitoring results <br /> The groundwater table remained above the top of all well screens during the November 2003 monitoring <br /> event The average depth to groundwater in the monitor wells was approximately 28 27 feet below the <br /> sThe <br /> urveyed well collar measuring points on November 6, 2003, 1 29 feet deeper than the previous Quarter <br /> northeast ater elevation consistent w h historical rs inicated groundwa ergradients the <br /> groundwater gradient was generally toward the <br /> gr dients <br /> Quarterly groundwater monitoring activities were conducted on January 28, 2004 The laboratory <br /> analytical results for the groundwater samples collected from MWA, MW-6, and MW-7 indicated that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.