My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0009595
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PARK
>
248
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0542235
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0009595
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/4/2020 3:18:55 PM
Creation date
5/4/2020 2:40:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0009595
RECORD_ID
PR0542235
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024262
FACILITY_NAME
CANEPA CAR WASH
STREET_NUMBER
248
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
PARK
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
13906035
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
248 E PARK ST
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Additional Soil and Groundwater Investigation Report <br /> Canepa's Car Wash(Park Street) <br /> May 8,2002 <br /> Page 2 <br /> interface In a letter dated September 7, 2001, Mr Wong of the PHS/EHD requested a work plan to <br /> Idefine the lateral and vertical extent of the contamination in groundwater and the vertical extent of the <br /> contamination in soil be submitted to the PHS/EHD by October 20, 2001 Condor prepared the Work Plan <br /> Additional Soil and Groundwater Investigation, dated October 17, 2001, and received conditional <br />' approval from the PHS/EHD in a letter dated October 24, 2001 The approval condition was the <br /> elimination of a proposed direct push groundwater sample location near monitor well MW-1 The field <br /> work was generally performed in accordance with the work plan and the conditional approval as <br />' described above <br /> 3.0 FIELD AND ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY <br /> iThis section includes a description of the site preparation, cone penetrometer boring procedures, direct <br /> push (hydropunch) groundwater sampling and soil sampling procedures, and the laboratory analytical <br /> testing methodology <br /> 3 I SITE PREPARATION <br /> Appropriate permits were obtained from the PHS/EHD and the City of Stockton prior to conducting the <br /> fieldwork The boring locations were marked with white paint, and the Underground Service Alert(USA) <br /> was notified approximately 72 hours in advance of the fieldwork to locate and identify underground <br />' utilities in the vicinity of the work area A utility locator was retained to scan for the presence of private <br /> buried utilities on site that were not marked by utility representatives in response to the USA request The <br /> PHS/EHD and City of Stockton were notified of the fieldwork schedule at least 48 hours in advance <br />' • 3 2 CONE PENETROMETER AND DIRECT PUSH PROCEDURES <br /> Prior to conducting investigation activities, an on site tailgate safety meeting was held with all drilling <br />' and Condor personnel in attendance A site-specific Health and Safety Plan was discussed with and <br /> presented to a]1 personnel for their signatures <br /> Gregg Drilling and Testing, Inc (Gregg) of Martinez, California, installed the CPT, soil and hydropunch <br /> borings CPT borings CPT] and CPT2 were hydraulically advanced from the ground surface to the <br /> bottom of the boring Measurements of the cone bearing pressure, sleeve friction, and dynamic pore <br /> water pressure were recorded at approximately two-inch intervals to provide a nearly continuous <br /> hydrogeologic log of the subsurface conditions Following completion of the CPT logging procedure, the <br /> CPT borings were abandoned by grouting from the bottom of the boring to the ground surface <br /> To collect the water samples, the hydropunch sampler was advanced to the desired sampling depth, the <br /> sampler push rod was pulled back, thereby exposing the sampler inlet screen to the formation material <br /> The groundwater samples were collected using a stainless steel bailer lowered through the hollow push <br /> rods into the sample screen The hydropunch borings were tremie grouted from the bottom of the boring <br /> to the ground surface upon completion of sampling <br /> tOne soil boring, SB-1, was advanced using direct push sampling technique The soil boring was sampled <br /> using a piston type soil sampler that was advanced to the desired sample depth, the piston pulled back, <br /> thereby opening the sampler, and the sampler advanced one foot to retrieve the sample After sample <br /> retrieval, the sampler was reinserted in the down-hole tubing and advanced to the next sample location <br /> The push rods and other down-hole equipment were decontaminated between sampling events by steam <br /> cleaning in order to prevent cross-contamination <br /> CONDOR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.