Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> quarterly Monuonn5 Report,July 3998 <br /> Canepa s Car Wash <br /> 248E Park St gust 24 n 98 <br /> August 24 1998 <br /> Page 2 <br /> IGroundwater Elevation The average depth to groundwater was approximately 24 2 feet below the monitor well <br /> measuring points (slightly below the ground surface) The groundwater elevation ranged from 14 09 to 12 13 <br /> feet below mean sea level (bmsl) Groundwater elevation contours are shown in Figure 3, Appendix A <br /> I <br /> 3 QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER MONITORING-JULY 1998 <br /> The work conducted during the quarterly groundwater monitoring was in accordance with the approved <br /> protocol formerly established at the site The scope-of-work conducted was approved by Mr Ronald Rowe of <br /> the PHS/EHD <br /> On July 23, 1998, Condor personnel made field observations and collected groundwater samples from the seven <br /> monitor wells at the site (see Figure 2, Appendix A, for well locations) All down-hole field equipment was <br /> decontaminated in the field with a solution of laboratory-grade, non-phosphate detergent and hydrocarbon-free <br /> water and raised with hydrocarbon-free water prior to use in each well All field instruments were calibrated to <br /> the manufacturer's recommended standards The water level in each well was measured to the nearest 0 01 foot <br /> with a standard battery-operated, flat-tape, water level meter A new, disposable, polyethylene bailer was <br /> lowered into each well to collect a field-inspection sample The bailer sample was inspected for floating <br /> product, slieen, discoloration and/or odor Floating product was not observed in any of the monitor wells <br /> I during the groundwater sampling Water levels in the wells were above the top of the well screens, however <br /> Petroleum odors were noted in MW-2 and MW-5 <br /> I• Each well was purged with a dedicated bailer until at least three well-casing volumes of water were removed <br /> and until tht pH, speutfic conductance, and temperature of the water had stabilized Groundwater Monitoring <br /> Field Forms are included in Appendix B Prior to sampling, the water was allowed to recover to at least 80% of <br /> I the pre-purge water level The purge water was discharged to 55-gallon drums and left on site to await <br /> disposal For each well <br /> • A groundwater sample was collected with a disposable, one-time-use, polyethylene bailer The <br /> sample was transferred to two 40-m1 glass VOA vials fitted with Teflon-lined caps Each vial <br /> was inverted and tapped to assure that no air bubbles were present <br /> • Each vial was labeled and placed in a cooler chilled with ice and delivered under chain-of- <br /> custody procedures to GeoAnalytical Laboratories, Inc, in Modesto, California, within 24 <br /> hours of sample collection The results of laboratory analyses are discussed in Section 4 2 <br />' 4. MONITORING RESULTS <br /> 4 1 Laboratory Analyses <br /> The groundwater samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-G) by <br /> Method 5030/LEFT and for benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and total xylenes (BTEX) by EPA Method 602 <br /> I Methyl tertiary Butyl Ether(MTBE) and gasoline oxygenates/additives were analyzed by EPA Method 8260 <br /> The laboratory certificates of analyses and chain-of-custody are located in Appendix C <br /> I `� CONDOR <br />