My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0009606
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PARK
>
248
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0542235
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0009606
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/4/2020 3:15:42 PM
Creation date
5/4/2020 2:43:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0009606
RECORD_ID
PR0542235
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024262
FACILITY_NAME
CANEPA CAR WASH
STREET_NUMBER
248
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
PARK
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
13906035
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
248 E PARK ST
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Quarterky Monitoring and Sensitive Receptor Survey Report <br /> Canepa's Car Wash(Park Street) <br /> November 5,2001 <br /> Page 2 <br /> 3.0 QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER MONITORING—OCTOBER 2001 <br /> On October 9, 2001, Condor representatives made field observations and collected groundwater samples <br /> from the seven monitor wells at the site (see Figure 2, Appendix A) The wells were sampled in the <br /> following order MW-1, MW-4, MW-2, MW-7, MW-5, MW-6, and MW-3 <br /> 3.1 GROUNDWATER MONITORING OBSERVATIONS AND PARAMETERS <br /> The static water level in each well was measured to the nearest 0 01-foot with a battery-operated, flat <br /> tape, water-level meter A disposable bailer was lowered into each well to check for floating product, <br /> petroleum odors, and sheen It should be noted that the groundwater table was above the top of all the <br /> I well screens A strong petroleum hydrocarbon odor was noted in the groundwater inspection samples <br /> collected from MW-2 and MW-5 All of the other groundwater inspection samples were noted as not <br /> having petroleum hydrocarbon odor <br /> IAll monitor wells were purged using a clean, single-use, polypropylene, disposable bailer <br /> Approximately three well casing volumes of water were purged from each well The purged water from <br /> I each well was placed in 55-gallon drums and left on site pending laboratory analytical results The <br /> groundwater monitoring field forms and groundwater measurement field form are included in Appendix <br /> B <br /> 3 2 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING <br /> The groundwater samples from the monitor wells were collected by filling three 40-m1 glass vials with <br /> I groundwater directly from the bottom of the bailer using a 100-m1/minute bottom-emptying device The <br /> sample containers were labeled, placed in a cooler chilled with lee, and delivered in accordance with <br /> chain-of-custody procedures to Exelchem Environmental Laboratories, Inc , in Roseville, California for <br /> analyses <br /> 4.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING RESULTS <br /> I4 1 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOURS <br /> On October 9, 2001, the depth to groundwater was measured in each monitor well prior to the collection <br /> I of groundwater samples The average depth to groundwater was approximately 25 2 feet below the well <br /> measuring points The average depth to groundwater increased approximately 12 feet since the previous <br /> monitoring event conducted in July 2001 The groundwater elevation ranged from 13 30 to 15 06 feet <br /> I below mean sea level (bmsl) The groundwater elevation contour map (Figure 2, Appendix A) indicates a <br /> groundwater gradient generally toward the northeast Groundwater elevation data is presented in Table 1, <br /> on the next page A hydrograph of groundwater elevations is included as Figure 3, Appendix A Note <br /> from the hydrograph in Figure 3 and a comparison of the tops of the well casing screen intervals versus <br /> the depth to water in Table 1, that the water table is approximately 14 5 to 19 5 feet above the top of the <br /> screen in all of the wells <br /> I <br /> i <br /> L CONDOR <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.