Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> ,i&0 <br /> [brines Y} 41onnu m,,Rrixs[ <br /> Ilr—ml[r[ Il I'r•�l <br /> • Groundwater Elevation 1 he average depth to groundwater was approximately 30 G feet below the <br /> ground surface (bgs) at the site The groundwater elevation ranged Irom 20 42 to 18 43 feet beloxv <br /> mein sea level (bins]) Groundwater elevation contours are shown in Figure 3 Appendix A <br /> 3 QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER MONITORING - OCTOBER 1997 <br /> The work conducted during the, quarterly 4groundwatcr monitoring was in accordance with the. approved <br /> protocol lormerly established at the site The. %cope-of-work prc.%eiated in the report was approved by Mr <br /> Ronald Rove of the PHS/EHD <br /> IOn October 23, 1997, Condor personnel made field observations and collected groundwater samples from the <br /> seven monitor wells at the site (see Figure 2 Appendi♦ A for well locations) All field equipment was <br /> decontaminated in tlae field with a solution of laboratory-grade non-phosphate detergent and hydrocarbon-free <br /> water and rinsed -,N ith hydrocarbon-free water prior to use in each well All field instruments were calibrated to <br /> the manufacturer's recommended standards The \.iter level m each well N%as measured to the nearest 0 0l foot <br /> with a standard battcrN-operated flat-tape water-level meter A new, disposable polyeth}]ene bailer was <br /> lowered into each -,\ell to collect a field-nispcction %ample The bailer sample was inspected for floating <br /> product sheen discoloration and/or odor Floating product was not observed in any of the monitor wells <br /> during the groundwater sampling However, water levels in the wells were abo'�c the top of the well screens <br /> Petrolcaina odors were detected in MW-2 and MW-5 <br /> Each well was purged v all a dedicated bailer until at least three well-casing volumes of water were removed <br /> and until the plf specific conductance and temperature of the water had stabilized Groundwater Monitoring, <br /> Field Forms are included in Appendix 13 Prior to sampling the \s iter was allowed to recover to at least 80% of <br /> the pre-purge «alter level The purge water «as discharged to 55-gallon drums and left oil Site to await <br /> disposal For each well <br /> • A groundwater sample was collected with a disposable, one-time-use polyeth}lene bailer The <br /> sample was transferred to three (3) 40-m1 glass VOA vials fitted with Teflon-lined caps Each <br /> ial was inverted and tapped to assure that no air bubbles were present <br /> • Each vial was labeled and placed in a cooler chilled with ice and delivered und4r chain-of- <br /> custody procedures to GeoAnalytical Laboratories Inc in Modesto, California within 24 <br />' hours of sample collection The results of laboratory analyses are discussed in Section 4 2 <br />' 4 INVESTIGATION RESULTS <br /> 4 1 Laboratory, Analyses <br />' The groundwater samples were andly7ed for total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as ga%ohne ( FPl I-G) by <br /> Method 5010/1,UFT and for benne IL, toluene, ethyl benzene and total xylene.% (BTEX) by LPA Method 602 <br />' �� CONDOR <br />