My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0009624
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PARK
>
248
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0542235
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0009624
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/4/2020 3:17:57 PM
Creation date
5/4/2020 2:47:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0009624
RECORD_ID
PR0542235
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024262
FACILITY_NAME
CANEPA CAR WASH
STREET_NUMBER
248
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
PARK
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
13906035
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
248 E PARK ST
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Quarterly Monitoring Report January 2000 <br /> Canepa s Car Wash(Park Street) <br /> March 2 2000 <br /> Page 2 <br />' 3 1 Groundwater Monitoring Observations and Parameters <br /> The static water level in each well was measured to the nearest 0 01-foot with a battery-operated, flat tape, <br />' water-level meter A clean, single-use, polypropylene, disposable bailer was lowered into each well to check <br /> for floating product, petroleum odors, and sheen Floating product was not observed in any of the monitor <br /> wells during the groundwater sampling It should be noted that the groundwater table was above the top of the <br />' well screens A moderate and strong petroleum hydrocarbon odor was noted in the groundwater samples <br /> collected from MW-2 and MW-5, respectively Petroleum hydrocarbon odors were not noted in the other <br /> groundwater samples <br />' All of the monitor wells were purged using new, disposable bailers Approximately three well casing volumes <br /> of water were purged from each well (see the Groundwater Monitoring Field Forms in Appendix B) The <br />' purged water from each well was placed in 55-gallon drums and left on site pending laboratory analytical <br /> results <br />' 3.2 Groundwater Sampling <br /> The groundwater samples were collected directly from disposable bailers by transferring the groundwater to <br /> two 40-milliliter glass vials The sample containers were labeled, placed in a cooler chilled with ice, and <br /> delivered in accordance with chain-of custody procedures to GeoAnalytical Laboratories, Inc , in Modesto, <br /> California for analyses <br /> 4. GROUNDWATER MONITORING RESULTS <br /> 4.1 Groundwater Elevation Contours <br /> On January 18, 2000, the depth to groundwater was measured in each monitor well prior to the collection of <br /> groundwater samples The average depth to groundwater on January 18, 2000, was approximately 24 6 feet <br /> below the well measuring points The average depth to groundwater increased approximately 0 8 feet since the <br /> previous monitoring event was conducted in October 1999 The groundwater elevation ranged from 12 72 to <br /> 14 42 feet below mean sea level (bmsl) The groundwater elevation contour map (Figure 3, Appendix A) <br /> indicates a groundwater gradient generally toward the northeast See Table 1 on the following page for <br /> groundwater elevation data A hydrograph of groundwater elevations is included as Figure 4, Appendix A <br /> 1 <br /> I � <br /> to CONDOR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.