My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012928
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PARK
>
248
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0542235
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012928
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/4/2020 3:00:48 PM
Creation date
5/4/2020 2:53:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012928
RECORD_ID
PR0542235
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024262
FACILITY_NAME
CANEPA CAR WASH
STREET_NUMBER
248
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
PARK
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
13906035
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
248 E PARK ST
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�. Quarterly Monitoring Report,October,1998 <br /> Canepa's Car Wash(Park Street) <br /> + µ - November 18,1998 <br /> Page 2 <br /> 3.1 Groundwater Monitoring Observations and Parameters <br /> The static water level in each well was measured to the nearest 0.01-foot with a battery-operated, flat tape,F` <br /> water-level meter.` A clean, single-use, polypropylene, disposable bailer was lowered into each well to check <br /> ,.: for floating product, petroleum odors, and sheen. Floating product was not observed in any of the monitor <br /> wells during the groundwater sampling. It should be noted that the groundwater table was above the top of the <br /> well screens. A strong petroleum hydrocarbon odor was noted in the groundwater sample collected from MW- <br /> k 2, and a moderate odor was noted in the sample collected from MW-5. Petroleum hydrocarbon odors were not <br /> _. F noted in the remaining groundwater samples. <br /> All of the monitorwells were purged using new, disposable bailers: At least 3 casing volumes of water were <br /> purged from each well (see the Groundwater Monitoring Field Forms in Appendix B). The purged water from <br /> each well was placed in 55-gallon drums and left on site pending laboratory analytical results. <br /> 3.2 Groundwater Sampling <br /> Each well was allowed to recover to at least 80% of its pre-purge water level before sampling.7 The <br /> groundwater samples were collected directly from disposable bailers by transferring the groundwater to two 40- <br /> ml glass vials. The sample containers were labeled, placed in a cooler chilled with ice, and delivered in <br /> accordance with chain-of-custody procedures to GeoAnalytical Laboratories, Inc., in Modesto, California, on <br /> the day of coIlection.: , <br /> I 4. GROUNDWATER MONITORING RESULTS <br /> 4.1 Groundwater Elevation Contours <br /> On October 21, 1998, the depth to groundwater was measured in each monitor well prior to the collection of <br /> groundwater samples.' The average depth to groundwater was approximately 24.6 feet below the well <br /> measuring points (slightly below the ground surface). The average depth to groundwater increased _ <br /> approximately 0.4 feet since the previous monitoring event conducted in July, 1998. The groundwater elevation <br /> ranged from 12.65 to 14.40 feet below mean sea level (bmsl). .Tbe groundwater elevation contour map (Figure <br /> Fi re <br /> 3, Appendix A) indicates a groundwater gradient generally toward the northeast. See Table 1, on the following <br /> page, for groundwater elevation data. A hydrograph of groundwater elevations is included-,as Figure 4, <br /> Appendix A. <br /> CONDOR <br /> ( <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.