Laserfiche WebLink
- <br />' 15 November 2004 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 96-0229 <br /> IPage 4 of 6 <br /> I Ground water elevation data collected from wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, MW-13 (A-D), MW-14 <br /> (A-D), and MW-16 (A-E) on 01 June 2004 is depicted on cross section B-B' (Figure 3), by <br /> determining the difference between ground water elevations (dh) and dividing by the difference of <br />' the screen interval midpoints (dl), the vertical gradient between adjacent screen intervals was <br /> calculated Generally,nearly flat,very slight upward and downward vertical gradients were observed <br /> between the Second Water Zone, Second Confining Unit and Third Water Zone screen intervals of <br />' all the above wells (Figure 3), however, moderate to steep downward vertical gradients were <br /> generally observed in the First Confining Unit <br />' Ground water elevations were plotted on scaled site plans for the informal First Water Zone <br /> (between 15 and 45 feet, Figure 4) and Second Water Zone (between 70 and 95 feet, Figure 5) <br /> I3 1 1 First Water Zone <br /> Ground water elevation data collected in the First Water Zone(15 to 45 feet bsg) at the site inferred <br /> a net ground water flow towards the east-northeast at a hydraulic gradient of approximately 0 005 <br /> I ft/fl(Figure 4), off-site towards the north and northeast(wells MW-6 through MW-12),net ground <br /> water flow was oriented more towards the northeast at hydraulic gradients between 0 004 ft/ft and <br /> 0 006 ft/ft <br /> 3 1 2 Second Water Zone <br /> Ground water elevation data collected in the Second Water Zone (70 to 95 feet bsg) at the site and <br /> off-site (wells MW-5 and MW-6 through MW-12) inferred a net ground water flow direction <br /> towards the east-northeast at hydraulic gradients of approximately 0 003 ft/ft (Figure 5) <br /> 3 2 LABORATORY RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> A total of forty-one ground water samples were submitted to Castle Analytical Laboratory(CAL), <br /> a DHS-certified laboratory in Atwater, California <br /> TPH-g was detected in eight water samples collected from wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, MW-6, <br /> MW-7, MW-9, MW-10B, and MW-16C at concentrations as high as 99,000 micrograms per liter <br /> (µg/1) in well MW-2 <br /> - Various BTEX constituents were detected in eight ground water samples collected from wells - <br /> MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, MW-6, MW-7, MW-9, MW-13A, and MW-13B at concentrations as high <br /> Advanced GeoEnvirenmental,Inc <br />