My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
6230
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0543479
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2020 9:58:34 AM
Creation date
5/5/2020 9:11:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0543479
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024679
FACILITY_NAME
CANEPA'S CAR WASH
STREET_NUMBER
6230
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
081360030
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
6230 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
613
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> • PROVISION 3: All work pre-approved by the "Fund" must be under the direction and approval of the <br /> San Joaquin County Health Services Department in order far this pre-approval to remain valid. <br /> i <br /> PROVISION 4: Please contact Mr. Ron Rowe of San Joaquin County if you have questions about specific <br /> soil and groundwater cleanup requirements that the cleanup system is expected to achieve. <br /> PROVISION 5: Once the above provisions have been met, the following cost pre-approval will take effect: <br /> PHS/EHD provides the following comments regarding the USTCF provisions above in response to <br /> concerns expressed by this agency, the consultant, and the responsible party; <br /> PROVISION 1. <br /> The site has been adequately assessed to the extent of recognizing the potential health risk and degradation <br /> of beneficial use ground water. However, it is important to note that conditions at any site may change as a <br /> result of meteorologic and related hydrogeologic phenomena which cannot be controlled by regulatory <br /> agencies, consulting firms, or the responsible party. An example is a rise in ground water elevation that <br /> can result in significant ground water contamination, potential offsite migration, and possible reduction in <br /> the effectiveness of the proposed soil vapor extraction system which is the case at this site. Therefore, <br /> additional assessment concurrent with remediation activities will be required by this agency to satisfy the <br /> condition quoted in provision I by the USTCF. <br /> PROVISION2. <br /> Given the dynamic conditions and documented actual effects at this site, Section 2725 of Corrective Action <br /> Regulations may not be applicable at this time. The responsible party, consultant, and PHS/EHD wish to <br /> apply Article 11 , Section 2722, where the responsible party shall take or contract for interim remedial <br /> actions, as necessary, to abate or correct the actual or potential effects of an unauthorized release. In <br /> accordance with the regulations, interim remedial actions can occur concurrently with any phase of <br /> corrective action. As information for this site becomes available through additional characterization and <br /> periodic evaluation of the remediation system effectiveness, a comprehensive corrective action plan will be <br /> required by this agency. The current remediation goal is reduction of secondary source contaminants <br /> residing in the remaining vadose zone in order to attempt to control degradation of beneficial use ground <br /> water and protection of the shallow municipal supply well. <br /> PROVISION 3. <br /> The responsible party is required to respond to directives and obtain approval for all phases of corrective <br /> action from PHS/EHD for all potentially reimbursable site activities. The compliance history at this site is <br /> excellent. <br /> PROVISION 4. <br /> The cleanup goals have been addressed in PHS/EHD response to provision 2 above. <br /> PROVISION 5. <br /> PHS/EHD and the responsible party request that a revision to the October 23, 1997 USTCF pre-approval <br /> be provided to the responsible which includes the responses and conditions above which allows the <br /> responsible party to meet conditions which are attainable given the site specific conditions documented to <br /> date. <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.