Laserfiche WebLink
II <br /> r <br /> Remo Canepa Page 3 of 4 <br /> 6230 Pacific Avenue March 5 , 2012 <br /> Stockton , CA <br /> and by TPHg and benzene (Figures 9 and 10) is the cross-gradient MW-2 , which is not <br /> impacted by MTBE . If MTBE figures prominently in the second release, this well data <br /> puts additional doubt on the value of the butane, pentane and isooctane data . <br /> • The EHD considers the carbon stable isotope analysis data presented to not be <br /> inconsistent with a possible two-release model , but the data might also be interpreted to <br /> show that the MTBE in MW-3 is simply older than that in SV-4, and represents a more <br /> advanced stage of isotopic fractionation . Intuitively, the fractionation processes would <br /> have longer to operate and yield an isotopically heavier MTBE , in the more distal MW-3 <br /> than in the more proximal SV-4. <br /> • The EHD does not see how the presence of highly volatile organic compounds in <br /> groundwater, but a lack of the same in soil gas samples , would support a conclusion that <br /> I, a second unauthorized release had occurred . <br /> f Similar to the last point, the EHD does not understand how the fact that the UST system <br /> appears to not be leaking at the present time demonstrates that there were two separate <br /> I, releases in the past, or any releases . <br /> ji <br /> II The lines of evidence presented by AGE may not convincingly demonstrate the occurrence of a <br /> N second release on the site from the current UST system , but none of them shows that a second <br /> occurrence had not occurred . During review of the site data , the EHD noted some data <br /> l relationships that may strengthen the inference of a second, release — although none of them is <br /> definitive either: <br /> • The first soil samples analyzed for MTBE , collected from SB- 1 in May 1998 , yielded <br /> detectable MTBE concentrations in samples collected between 25 feet below surface <br /> grade (bsg) to 70 feet bsg , with concentrations as high as 37 milligrams per kilogram <br /> j (mg/Kg ) at 35 feet bsg . MTBE detected in samples from 55 feet and 70 feet bsg could <br /> possibly be due to cross contamination from impacted groundwater. The MTBE <br /> concentrations in samples collected at 25 feet, 30 feet, 35 feet and 40 feet bsg exceeded <br /> the concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPHg ) , and <br /> benzene , toluene , ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX) . Boring SB- 1 was advanced <br /> approximately 7 feet from vapor extraction well SV-4 . Soil boring B- 1 , advanced in 1993 <br /> about the same distance , but on the opposite side of SV-4 , generally had significantly <br /> higher TPHg and BTEX concentrations at the same or similar depths compared to SB-1 <br /> samples, the B-1 samples were not analyzed for MTBE. <br /> As MTBE is highly volatile and has less affinity for sorption to soil than TPHg and BTEX, <br /> the EHD infers from the TPHg and BTEX data that the soil vapor extraction (SVE) <br /> operation between March 1994 and June 1995 may have significantly reduced the <br /> contaminant mass in soil sampled by SB- 1 , and that the MTBE in the SBA soil samples <br /> may be due to a release from the UST system after the SVE system ceased operation in <br /> June 1995 . <br /> • The highest concentration of dissolved MTBE detected was 740 , 000 pg/L, encountered <br /> in SV-4 in July 2002 , approximately nine years after the UST system had been replaced . <br /> This was also after the initial SVE operation from March 1994 through June 1995 , and <br /> during intermittent operation of the SVE system restarted in 1999 . This is a remarkably <br /> high concentration after nine years and intermittent remediation by SVE , intuitively it <br /> demonstrates either a second release occurred or there have been very minimal effects <br /> of natural attenuation and intermittent active remediation . <br /> UAR Request Response Letter 0312 <br />