Laserfiche WebLink
Quarterly Monitoring July 2001 and <br /> Sensitive Receptor Survey Report <br /> Canepa's Car Wash(Pacific Avenue) <br /> Page 5 <br /> TABLE 2 <br /> Laboratory Analytical Results (July 19 and 20, 2001) <br /> B T E X MTBE TPH-G <br /> Reporting limits 03 03 03 06 10 005 <br /> Monitor Well I D Etg/L pg/L pg/L µg/L ltg/L mg/L <br /> 1707-MW 1-7/20/01 230 66 40 70 1,200 1 0 <br /> 1707-MW2-7/19101 29,000 1,500 2,500 6,600 190 103 <br /> 1707-MW3-7/20101 <0 3 <0 3 <0 3 <0 6 93 <005 <br /> 1707-MW4-7/19/01 <0 3 <0 3 <0 3 <0 6 < 1 0 <0 05 <br /> 1707-MW5-7/19/01 <0 3 <0 3 <0 3 <0 6 < 1 0 <0 05 <br /> 1707-MW6-7/20/01 <0 3 <0 3 <0 3 <06 < 1 0 <0 05 <br /> 1707-MW7-7/19101 <0 3 <0 3 <0 3 <06 < 1 0 <0 05 <br /> 1707-MW8-7/19/01 <0 3 <0 3 <0 3 <0 6 < 1 0 <0 05 <br /> Unit Conversions Analytical <br /> µg/l-parts per billion(ppb) B,T,E X=benzene,toluene,ethyl benzene,and total xylenes <br /> mg/L parts per million(ppm) TPH-G=total petroleum hydrocarbons,quantified as gasoline <br /> MT13E=Methyl tertiary-Butyl Ether <br /> 4 3 SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION SYSTEM <br /> Operation of the SVE system was initiated on March 15, 1999 Condor monitored the system on a <br /> monthly basis Volatile organic vapor screening was performed with a photo-ionization detector (PID) at <br />' the system inlet and exhaust to evaluate the destruction efficiency of the thermal oxidation unit Vacuum <br /> measurements to inches of water were recorded from ports installed at the SVE wells to evaluate the <br /> radius of Influence Various other system parameters were monitored to maintain optimum performance <br />' of the SVE system (see SVE System Log, Appendix D) <br /> The hydrocarbon destruction efficiency for the year 2000 ranged from 96 66% to 100% The average <br /> hydrocarbon destruction rate for 2000 was 98 8% The system was turned off from January 18, 2001 <br /> until January 24, 2001 for repairs The efficiency rate upon restarting the system was 69% The system <br /> was restarted for efficiency monitoring on January 25 and February 6, 2001 Destruction efficiency was <br /> 80 3% and 79 6% on those respective days Because of the low efficiency upon restarting the system, <br />' additional monitoring of and adjustments to the system were conducted in an attempt to achieve proper <br /> efficiency Because the 95% efficiency required by the air permit could not be achieved, the system was <br /> removed from service on January 24, 2001 pending further evaluation <br /> On June 25 2001 a Condor representative was on site to determine the operational status of the SVE <br /> P <br /> system and found that the system would clot start The blower motor was inoperative and had to be <br /> t rewired On July 10 a Condor representative started the SVE system After one hour the system was <br /> operating within normal parameters with a 95% destruction efficiency The system remained in operation <br /> until July 27 During that time destruction efficiencies ranged from 88 4% to 100% On July 27 Condor <br /> 1 conducted monitoring at the site and found the destruction efficiency had dropped to between 80% and <br /> 90% The air permit for the system requires a minimum 95% destruction efficiency, so the system was <br /> Ntliw <br /> �� CONDOR <br />