Laserfiche WebLink
Quarterly Monitoring Report July 1999 <br /> Canepa s Car Wash(Pacific Avenue) <br /> August 20 1999 <br /> Page -2 <br /> Prior to granting approval of installation of a new SVE system, the Underground Storage Tank Clean-Up <br /> Fund indicated the need fot additional investigation Condor subsequently conducted the installation and <br />' sampling of two soil borings adjacent to the SVE well array The investigation included soil vapor <br /> screening using a Stmulprobe sampling device in soil vapor collection mode The results indicate high <br /> levels of volatile organtc compounds are present in the soil vapor at the site The laboratory analytical <br />' results of the soil and groundwater samples collected during the investigation are presented in Report—Soil <br /> and Groundwater Investigation, dated June 12, 1998 Operation of the SVE system was initiated on <br /> March 15, 1999 A detailed Site History is included in Appendix B <br /> 3 0 QUARTERLY GROUNDWATER MONITORING -JULY 1999 <br /> On July 26 and 27, 1999, a Condor representative performed field observations and collected <br /> groundwater samples from the eight nnonitor wells at the site (see Figure 2, Appendix A, for well <br /> locations) The sampling order was as follows MW-8, MW-5, MW-4, MW-1, MW-7, MW-6, MW-3, <br /> and MW-2 <br /> 3 1 GROUNDWATER MONITORING OBSERVATIONS AND PARAMETERS <br /> The static water level in cacti well was measured to the nearest 0 01-foot with a battery-operated, flat <br /> tape, water-level meter A clean, single-use, polypropylene, disposable bailer was lowered into each well <br /> to check for floating product, petroleum odors, and sheen Floating product was not observed in any of <br /> the monitor wells during the groundwater sampling It should be noted that the surface of the <br /> groundwater table was above the top of the well screens A moderate petroleum hydrocarbon odor was <br /> noted in the groundwater sample collected from MW-1 A slight petroleum hydrocarbon odor was noted <br /> in the groundwater sample collected from MW-2 Petroleum hydrocarbon odors were not noted in the <br /> remaining groundwater samples <br /> All of the monitor wells except MW-1 were purged using new, disposable bailers Monitor well MW-i <br /> was purged with a Redi-Flow submersible pump that was decontaminated prior to use Approximately <br /> three well casing volumes of water were purged from each well {see the Groundwater Monitoring Field <br /> Forms in Appendix B) The purged water from each well was placed in a plastic, 55-gallon drum and <br /> left on site pending analytical results <br /> I <br /> 3 2 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING <br /> The groundwater samples were collected directly from the bailers by transferring the groundwater to two <br /> 40-nil glass vials The sample containers were labeled, placed in a cooler chilled with ice, and delivered, <br /> in accordance with chain-of-custody procedures, to GeoAnalytical Laboratories, Inc , in Modesto, <br /> California, within approximately 24 hours of sample collection <br /> 4 0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING RESULTS <br /> 41 GROUNDWATER ELEVATION CONTOURS <br /> On July 26, 1999, the dt,pth to groundwater was nncasuied in each monitor well prior to the collection of <br /> groundwater samples I he average depth to groundwater was approximately 33 7 feet below he well <br /> L� CONDOR <br />