Laserfiche WebLink
ECanepa's Car Wash(Pacific Avenue) <br /> Problem Assessment Report and Corrective Action Plan <br /> Page 7 <br /> iThe historical groundwater quality data are presented in Appendix C. Volatile organic compounds <br /> (VOCs) were detected in samples from five of the eight monitor wells in March 1994. VOCs were <br /> detected in samples from monitor wells installed close to the dispenser island and the distribution <br /> suggests radial migration away from the source area. The suggested migration pattern is consistent with <br /> the apparent groundwater mound depicted by the 1994 groundwater contours. Subsequently, following <br /> survey of collar elevations of all of the monitor wells in 2001, the groundwater mound was found to be <br /> the result of an error in the original 1994 survey. Based on the 2001 collar-elevation survey, the March <br /> 1994 groundwater gradient was to the northeast. The gradient in April 2002 was approximately 0.003, <br /> also to the northeast(Figure 8). <br /> The groundwater plume in 2002 is illustrated by the plan view distribution of benzene in Figure 9 and in <br /> cross section in Figure 10. The distribution of MTBE in groundwater is shown in plan view in Figure 9 <br />' and in cross section in Figure 11. The concentration of TPH-G ranged from 40 mg/1 in MW-2 to less than <br /> 1 mg/I in monitor wells MW-1, MW-11, MW-3, and MW-4. TPH-G was not detected in groundwater <br /> samples from the other monitor wells. The groundwater sample collected from MW-12d in April 2002, <br />' the deep monitor well installed near the southwest corner of the dispenser island, contained benzene at 16 <br /> �ig/1 and THP-G at 0.53 mg/l. The second quarter(April) 2002 groundwater quality data from all monitor <br /> wells is plotted in Figure 12. <br /> A conservative order-of-magnitude estimate of the volume of benzene in groundwater is based on the <br /> plan view distribution of benzene shown in Figure 9, the data plotted in Figure 12, and water quality data <br /> from monitor wells MW-1 and MW-2. The data used are as follows: <br /> • Estimated plume volume 372,000 ft3 <br /> + Geometric mean porosity 0.35 <br />' a Volume of water in the saturated zone (130,250 ft )3,690,000 liters <br /> • Geometric mean benzene concentration 6.53 mg/l <br /> a Mass of benzene in the given volume of groundwater 24.1 kg or 6.7 gallons. <br /> The evolution of water quality in monitor wells MW-1 and MW-2 is illustrated by the plots of benzene <br /> concentrations in Figure 13 and the plot of MTBE concentrations in Figure 14. The hydrograph and <br />' screen position also are plotted for each well. The concentration of benzene in samples from MW-1 <br /> decline sharply as the water level rises above the well screen; however, the distribution of benzene in <br /> MW-2 indicates an upward trend with time similar to the trend of the hydrograph. The trends for MTBE <br /> in the samples from both wells generally are upward. Both lateral migration of the VOC plume toward <br /> MW-2 (Table 2) and down gradient migration from the source area toward MW-1 are indicated by the <br /> water quality data. Benzene has been near or below the analytical detection limit in samples from MW-3, <br />' MW-4, MW-5, and MW-8. Benzene concentrations in MW-6 and MW-7 declined rapidly with the water <br /> table rise. <br /> To date, no direct actions have been taken to remove the petroleum hydrocarbons from the groundwater <br /> bene.,+3, the r;+A The re Alnl of the ynlat;lP.0 exsnlvarl frnm oroundwa.ter by the soil vapor extraction <br /> VV��HCLLh he site � J <br /> system has had negligible effect on groundwater quality. <br /> 1 6.0 SENSITIVE RECEPTOR SURVEY AND RISK BASED CORRECTIVE ACTION <br /> EVALUATION <br /> Condor conducted a sensitive receptor survey within a 2,000-foot radius of the site to identify potential <br /> areas of groundwater recharge or discharge (surface water bodies), schools, and potential water well users <br /> �� CONDOR <br />