My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006690
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
6230
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0543479
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006690
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2020 10:26:48 AM
Creation date
5/5/2020 9:32:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006690
RECORD_ID
PR0543479
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024679
FACILITY_NAME
CANEPA'S CAR WASH
STREET_NUMBER
6230
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
081360030
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
6230 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Canepa's Car Wash(Pacific Avenue) <br /> Problem Assessment Report and Corrective Action Plan <br /> Page 14 <br /> estimate of less than $3,000. However, the equipment and installation costs are estimated to be $50,000 <br /> to $100,000. <br /> 7.4 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE <br /> The cost analysis indicates that the evaluated alternatives are all similar in initial equipment and <br /> installation costs. However, due to the heterogeneous nature of the soils as noted in Section 7.2 above, <br /> we are concerned that air sparging and ozone injection may not be effective. A pump and treat will <br /> provide more comprehensive capture for treatment of contaminated groundwater. By lowering the <br /> groundwater, the existing soil vapor extraction system can capture exposed contaminants that are now <br /> below the groundwater level. Preliminary calculations indicate that at low pumping rates (on the order of <br /> 5 gallons per minute), the capture zone would eventually extend as much as 1500 feet. However, the <br /> drawdown would only be about 10 feet. This would provide excellent plume capture but would still <br /> require some additional in situ treatment to complete remediation in a timely fashion. Consequently, we <br /> are proposing. <br /> • A pump and treat system with ex situ treatment of the groundwater, to provide for plume capture <br /> and remediation of groundwater from near the source area; <br /> • Soil vapor extraction to remove those contaminants in the vadose zone exposed by the <br /> groundwater drawdown; and <br /> • The further remediation of groundwater, as necessary based on the results of the SVE/pump and <br /> treat, by enhanced biodegradation and/or chemical oxidation at injection points within the plume. <br /> 8.0 TARGET CLEAN-UP LEVELS <br /> . The proposed clean-up level for benzene in groundwater at the site is the risk based contaminant levels <br /> for benzene at a cancer risk level of one in ten thousand from the ASTM Standard Guide for Risk-Based <br /> Corrective Action Applied at Petroleum Release Sites (E 1739-95), Table X2.1 Example Tier 1 Risk <br /> Based Screening Level (RBSL) Look-up Table. This level provides a significant level of source reduction <br /> and is based on minimizing potential for human health risks in the vicinity of the site. The completed <br /> contaminant transport pathway is�inhalation of indoor air volatilizing from groundwatern a commercial <br /> setting. The proposed clean-up level for benzene is: <br /> Groundwater benzene—73.9 µg/L <br /> E 1739-95 does not include MTBE in Table X2.1. However, the maximum contaminant limit (MCL) for <br />' MTBE is 13 ug/L. As a default,the proposed clean-up level for MTBE is: <br /> Groundwater MTBE— 13 ug/L <br />' Attainment of the clean-up levels for groundwater will be determined by the highest concentration of <br /> benzene and MTBE in extracted groundwater (if a pump and treat system is installed) or in any of the <br /> monitoring wells. Once the clean-up levels are achieved, the remediation system should be monitored for <br /> at least four quarters to verify that the clean-up goals have been achieved. Site closure may be warranted <br /> when it can be demonstrated that water quality goals have been achieved during the time period proposed. <br /> 1 9.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> The site contains significant subsurface contamination from hydrocarbon fuels that could create health <br /> hazards from toxic vapors in the on-site structure, or by migration off site. The most cost effective <br /> Mremediation strategy involves groundwater pumping for treatment, vapor extraction, and potentially <br /> I <br /> } <br />' �� CONDOR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.