Laserfiche WebLink
Canepa's Car Wash(Pacific Avenue) <br /> Problem Assessment Report and Corrective Action Plan <br /> Page 3 <br /> 1� optimum pumping rate of 5 gpm with an effective radius of 140 feet. Aquifer permeability for a twenty-foot <br /> screen length was estimated at 126 gpd/ft2. <br /> Quarterly groundwater monitoring was conducted at the site by WHF from March 1994 through June 1995. <br /> Historical groundwater analytical data indicated elevated concentrations of TPH-G and BTEX in MW-1, <br /> MW-2,MW-6, and MW-7. Low concentrations of TPH-G and BTEX were detected in MW-3, MW-4, MW- <br /> 5, and MW-8. Condor has been conducting quarterly groundwater monitoring at the site since August 1996. <br /> The elevation of the water table has generally increased since quarterly monitoring began in March 1994. <br /> Analyses of groundwater samples collected from selected SVE wells (SVE-1, 2, 3, 5, 7, S, and 9) indicated <br /> that high concentrations of TPH-G, BTEX, and MTBE were present in the former location of the fuel <br /> dispenser islands. <br /> A site investigation at the Canepa's Car Wash facility was conducted by Condor on July 31, 1996. The <br /> investigation included a review of existing reports of investigations and an evaluation of the existing SVE <br /> system located at the site. The report of the results was titled Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE)System Evaluation, <br /> dated September 23, 1996. Using the soil analytical data available for the site, Condor estimated that the <br /> volume of hydrocarbons present in the soil beneath the site was approximately 13,000 pounds or 2,050- <br /> gallons (6.34 lbs/gal). Based on the results of the evaluation of the SVE system and site background data, <br /> Condor recommended that operation of the ICU be suspended because the system did not appear to meet <br /> APCD permit conditions (i.e., 95% destruction efficiency). Condor further recommended that a 150 SCFM <br /> catalytic oxidation unit(CAT-OX) be installed at the site to extract and treat the gasoline contamination in the <br /> vadose zone. The configuration of the existing SVE wells appeared to be sufficient to remove a majority of <br /> the remaining gasoline contaminants in the vadose zone. <br />� . During the fall of 1997, an Authority to Construct permit was applied for with the APCD for the installation <br /> of an SVE system. Prior to granting approval of the installation of the SVE system,the Underground Storage <br /> Tank Clean-Up Fund indicated the need for additional investigation. Condor subsequently conducted the <br />' installation and sampling of two soil borings adjacent to the SVE well array. The investigation included soil <br /> vapor screening using the Simulprobe sampling device in soil vapor collection mode. The results of the <br /> additional investigation indicated that high levels of volatile organic compounds were present in the soil and <br /> in the soil vapor at the site. The findings of the investigation were reported in Report — Soil and <br /> IGroundwater Investigation, dated June 12, 1998. <br /> Operation of the SVE system was initiated on March 15, 1999. Initial concentrations of total volatile <br /> organics up to 2,000 ppm were reduced to approximately 100 ppm by February 2001. SVE operation was <br /> stopped on February 6,2001 as a result in a drop in the SVE efficiency below 95%. Minor modifications and <br /> repairs were made to the blower extraction system and the SVE was restarted on July 10, 2001. By July 27, <br />' 2001, it was determined that the restarted SVE system would not maintain 95%efficiency. It was determined <br /> that the catalytic oxidation unit was not designed to efficiently remove the lower concentrations of petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon vapors left in the soil. In a letter dated August 20, 2001, Condor proposed a carbon treatment <br /> unit to replace the catalytic oxidation unit. <br /> The SVE system was modified to utilize two 1,000 pound vapor phase carbon vessels connected in series, <br /> and restarted on March 13, 2002. The system influent and effluent soil vapor flow rates and influent, mid <br /> ttank and effluent soil vapor concentrations are measured weekly using a picot tube and photoionization <br /> detector (PID), respectively. Soil vapor samples from the influent, mid tank and effluent sample ports for <br /> laboratory analysis are collected quarterly. <br /> ttN• <br /> �� CONDOR <br />