My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
1665
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545638
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2020 11:44:53 AM
Creation date
5/5/2020 10:57:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0545638
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005998
FACILITY_NAME
UNION OIL SS#2859
STREET_NUMBER
1665
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
13702031
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1665 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
656
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
F <br /> •F. ' <br /> STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD <br /> WORKSHOP SESSION-DIVISION OF CLEAN WATER PROGRAMS <br /> March 3, 1999 <br /> ITEM: <br /> SUBJECT: PETITION OF UNOCAL CORPORATION FOR REVIEW OF DENIAL OF <br /> PETROLEUM UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SITE CLOSURE AT 1665 <br /> PACIFIC AVENUE, STOCKTON,CALIFORNIA <br /> DIS- <br /> CUSSION: Health and Safety Code section 25299.39.2,subdivision(b)provides that a petroleum <br /> underground storage tank(UST)owner or operator who believes that the corrective <br /> action plan for the owner's or operator's site has been satisfactorily implemented may <br /> petition the manager of the UST Cleanup Fund(Fund) for review of the owner's or <br /> operator's case. UNOCAL Corporation(petitioner)filed a petition pursuant to this <br /> provision for review of the decision of the San Joaquin County Environmental Health <br /> Division(County)not to close this case. <br /> Petitioner contends that its case should be closed because the concentrations of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons zit its site do not pose a threat to human Health and safety,or <br /> the environment. <br /> The Fund manager has reviewed petitioner's case and has concluded that petitioner's <br /> contention has merit. Accordingly,the proposed order finds that the detectable <br /> concentrations of residual petroleum at petitioner's site do not pose a threat to human <br /> health and safety,or the environment,and do not affect,or threaten to affect,current or <br /> probable future beneficial uses of water. Therefore,the proposed order requires <br /> petitioner's case to be closed. <br /> POLICY <br /> ISSUE: Should the State Water Resources Control Board adopt the proposed order? <br /> REGIONAL <br /> BOARD <br /> IMPACT: Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> FISCAL <br /> IMPACT: None <br /> STAFF <br /> RECOMMEN- <br /> DATION: Adopt the proposed order. <br /> Policy Review <br /> Legal Review <br /> Fiscal Review <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.