My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
1665
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545638
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2020 11:44:53 AM
Creation date
5/5/2020 10:57:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0545638
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005998
FACILITY_NAME
UNION OIL SS#2859
STREET_NUMBER
1665
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95204
APN
13702031
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1665 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
656
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br /> Petitioner then concluded that the site was suitable for closure as a low-risk groundwater <br /> case and that further site assessment or corrective action was not necessary. <br /> By letter to petitioner dated March 3, 1997,County staff concluded that the plume <br /> of dissolved phase petroleum hydrocarbons was about 130 feet long and 60 feet wide, <br /> that the average benzene concentration within the limits of the plume was 32 ppb, and <br /> that the plume was stable and declining. However, the County also concluded that site <br /> closure at that time was not appropriate without additional information that demonstrated <br /> that natural attenuation was occurring and an explanation that natural attenuation would <br /> restore the beneficial use of groundwater. <br /> By letter to the UST Cleanup Fund Manager dated June 13, 1997, petitioner <br /> requested that its case be reviewed for closure. Petitioner contended that petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon sources (USTs and piping)had been removed from the site, impacted soil <br /> had been excavated, SVE had removed additional residual petroleum hydrocarbons in <br /> soil, free product has never been observed, MTBE has never been detected in <br /> groundwater, the nearest public water supply well is approximately 800 feet from the site, <br /> and the County had determined that assessment of the extent of affected soil and <br /> groundwater is complete. <br /> By letter to the UST Cleanup Fund dated January 16, 1998, County staff <br /> expressed concern regarding petitioner's failure to define the extent of affected soil and <br /> groundwater and to document the volume of affected soil excavated at the site. <br /> In March 1998, responding to the County's request for information demonstrating <br /> that natural attenuation was occurring at the site, petitioner analyzed groundwater <br /> samples from site wells for selected inorganic constituents which are indicative of <br /> microbial metabolism of petroleum hydrocarbons. Theseanalyses, in addition to <br /> showing that very active biodegradation was occurring within the dissolved phase <br /> hydrocarbon plume, also showed that in shallow groundwater, background concentrations <br /> of nitrate (about 70 ppm), iron (as high as 3.4 ppm), and Total Dissolved Solids (1,000 to <br /> 1,200 ppm) exceeded State MCLs (45 ppm, 0.3 ppm, and 500 ppm respectively). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.