Laserfiche WebLink
RIB" <br /> Decembc: IS, 1991 ` <br /> Dormer Unocal Bladon 2859. Stoclrton, California <br /> --- <br /> A <br /> Y, r <br /> Applied GeoSysterns began,""environmental investigation in conjunction with unde reolor d- <br /> storage tank removal in ,1%Iarch and April 1988. During this investigation, a g S <br /> ist <br /> observ�cl rcrnoval of site underground storage tanks and collected soil samples for laboratory <br /> analysis of hydrocarbons. Results of aaalyses indicated tltat hydrocarbons were present in <br /> the sol! underlying the tank cavity (Applied GeoSysterns, April 2.8, 1988, Report No. <br /> tale3SOS 1). III Jane 1988, we ir;stalled eround-water monitoring wells MW-1 throueh iVi1Y 3 <br /> (Applied GeoSysterns. July 28, 1988, Report No. 38012-2). Results indicated a further <br /> investigation of ground water down-gradient was wa-ranted. Therefore,in August 1989,two <br /> groundwater wells were installed offsite to delineate dissolved hydrocarbons (applied <br /> mo GeoSvstems, December 12. 1990, Report No. 38012-5). <br /> In response to the detection of hydrocarbons in soil and ground water. Applied GeoSystems <br /> began periodic monitoring of the 7round water in June 1988. Results of Previous <br /> monitoring events indicated that dissolved hydrocarbons were detected in water samples <br /> coliected from the fiva wells; tite ltigltest concentranoils of ltycrucarbons were detected ill <br /> well iV11V-2. We evaluated the direction of ground-water flow to be northeast from June <br /> 1988 to May 1990 (before the wells were dry). The average gradient was 0.002. The <br /> direction of ground water flow for yiMay 30. 1990, was to the northeast as shown on Plate 2. <br /> GROUND-WATER SAMPLING <br /> A RESNA technician was onsite August 25, 1991, to collect groundwater samples front <br /> wells MW-4 and ivi%V-S for subjective analysis using procedures summarized in an <br /> attachment to this report. The technician noted 'to subjective evidence of hydrocarbons in <br /> the two wells. Cumulative results of subjective analyses are presented its fable I. <br /> The technician purged wells ,IMW-4 and and collected water samples for laboratory <br /> analyses. A Chairs of Custody Record was initiated in the field and accompanied the <br /> samples to the laboratory. A copy of that record is attached. The methods of ground-water <br /> sampling are discussed in an attachment to this rr:port. The purge water was stored onsite <br /> in properly labeled 17-E steel drums pending the results of laboratory analyses. At Unocal's <br /> request, drummed water was subsequently removed and disposed of by Armour Petroleum <br /> Fairfield. California. on September ?. 1991. <br /> Service and Equipment Corporation of <br /> LABORATORY ANALYSES AND RESULTS <br /> The water samples were submitted for analyses of total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline <br /> (TPHg)using modified Environmental 1't .section Agency(EPA) Method 8015 and benzene. <br /> toluene, ethvlbenzene, and total sylerte isomers (BTEX) using EPA Method 602. <br /> Laboratory analyses were performed Applied Analytical Environmental Laboratories in <br /> ns3on;5 � <br /> NOW <br />